Forum Topic

With the backing of the Churchfield Community Association, I was the main person behind the previous vote that resulted in restricting parking in K1 & 2 to an hour in the morning and an hour in the afternoon. It took about 4 years to finally get the vote and get the council to agree to make the change. In addition, volunteers leafleted some few thousand residences to persuade people of the need for it.It is true that Derwentwater, Newburgh and Stuart Roads voted against (or came close to). It was the council that decided to ignore this when they came to set the new parking times/borders – for, they said, practical reasons (traffic wardens).But while I do sympathise with the present situation in this part of Acton (and believe that it will only get worse), the previous situation shouldn't be forgotten. We began the campaign to change the parking mainly to aid the shops in Churchfield Road, which were unable to attract passing trade because there was no place for potential customers to park. Even the few paid parking spaces were monopolised by the cars attached to the local minicab company, and lots of fights broke out (sometimes physical ones). Meanwhile, there were acres of empty spaces in neighbouring streets during the day.So I guess my plea is that we should try to find a solution that won't kill Churchfield Road, which has never been livelier, but will make your situation better. Be sure to get the council to let you have a preview of the questions that the new parking survey will ask – when we did, we found that people were asked to say yes or no to the status quo in one question, and then alternatives were dealt with in a separate one. (We got them to make all the choices equal.)The campaign to change the parking times last time (which, by the way, didn't benefit me personally at all) was very much led by the local residents. It's unfortunate that a small section has come to suffer from what was done.BTW, the local shop owners didn't vote – they weren't allowed to – and they didn't run a concerted campaign (that was us). But they did put posters in their windows!

Nancy Duin ● 4178d

Jo, it's always worth knowing the results of previous consultations to see how decisions were made and assess the prospects of any campaign for change being successful. And in this case, I think you and other residents will be very interested in these results.The Council's Cabinet (the decision making body of the Council) decided to make the change from K to K1 at its meeting on 21 February 2012. At the bottom of this message is a link to the report that was considered. Appendix 1 (page 11) of the report shows a breakdown of CPZ residents survey results by street. Most residents in Derwentwater Rd wanted to retain the Zone K hours and most residents in Newburgh and Stuart Rds actually wanted longer hours (though the colours on the map for Stuart Rd are somewhat ambiguous). I suspect the reason hours were reduced is that, taken as a whole, most residents in Zone K north of the High St wanted shorter hours. So you didn't get what you voted for.Council CPZ policy (which I wrote and pushed through when responsible for transport policy back in 2008) requires CPZ results to be looked at on an area rather than individual street basis, but what constitutes an area is open to interpretation and should be looked at in each case. Looking at the results I think it would have been more sensible to retain Zone K hours for those south of Churchfield Rd and in your little area as they are more likely to be affected by shopper parking than those north of Churchfield Rd. This is good ammo to throw at the councillors, who do not seem to have looked at the survey results in sufficient detail. http://www2.ealing.gov.uk/ealing3/export/sites/ealingweb/services/council/committees/agendas_minutes_reports/cabinet/24may2011-15may2012/_21_Feb_2012/Item_17_-_CPZ_Implementation_Update_Report_v2.pdf

Vlod Barchuk ● 4241d