Forum Topic

Ms Lowe fails to name the members of Catalyst Housing who actually spoke at St Mary's Church meeting on 15th March which is still not on the Central Acton Neighbourhood Forum website.Her claims that current estate is badly in need of repair with poor insulation and mould (which she misspelled) are being address by Catalyst Housing and Labour Councillor Dan Crawford. The figures she gives may indeed have been provided by Julia Moulder and Chris Paterson but they prove they will not generate the surplus required to build social housing. It is course possible that the tax payer will have to step in as with the well publicized rat infested Catalyst shared ownership scheme in South Acton.Catalyst own research which Ms Lowe praises was conducted 2 years ago by Derek Warren. He got 12 responses from the 360 questionnaires he sent out. His ethics and methodology was criticized by the Market Research Society.Catalyst Housing repeatedly refuses to conduct a ballot of their tenants because contrary to Ms Lowe's claims most tenants have repeatedly made it clear they do not want their homes demolished and have been doing so since November 2014. Ms Lowe's lies on behalf of the Conservative Party have no basis in fact and given her close association with racists of Ukip through Central Acton Neighbourhood Forum can only have been designed to create racial tensions on the Friary Park estate which Catalyst believe will make it easier to get permission to demolish 230 family homes.

Martin Cain ● 3317d

With a new planning application for the Friary Park estate expected next month, Catalyst Housing came to St. Mary's on Wednesday 15th March to explain the changes they have made since they first proposed the demolition and rebuild of the estate more than two years ago. The proposed design and a handy list of FAQs are on their website.www.chug.or.uk/regeneration.The current estate is badly in need of repair. Insulation is poor, energy costs are too high, mould is common, and most tenants are anxious for change. The question is. Can it be repaired or must it be demolished? Catalyst say the latter.Catalyst say regeneration of the estate will not be possible without private investment, which means the building of homes for private sale on the land.The current number of units on the estate is 225. The proposal is for approximately  201 social housing units, 86 shared ownership, approximately 236 shared living accommodation for private rent ( studio apartments with shared facilities) and  110  for private sale. You will of course notice that many more homes will be built on the same piece of land. There will be much reduced open space and no community centre.The private apartments will be in a high rise block of 17 storeys, overlooking Acton Main Line station and the views to the west. It seems that high rise of this type commands a bigger sale price.Parking on the estate is set to reduce and the the proximity of the estate to public transport is expected to reduce the need for private motoring. There will be limited basement parking available under one of the blocks and some street parking. Residents on the estate will not be allowed permits for nearby streets. It is assumed that nearby streets will have all day controlled parking.Catalyst own research shows highest need for family social housing so unlikely there will be units for single people or childless couples. We did not discuss what would happen to current single residents as Catalyst are still in discussion with individuals. Rents will be the same as for any Catalyst apartment but there will be a service charge. Catalyst believe this additional cost will be mitigated by lower energy costs.  Catalyst expect the regeneration of the estate will not be complete until 2023. The first phase scheduled to begin next year will be social housing, unlike previous plans to begin with the private apartments.Locals attending the public meeting were most concerned with the lack of an environmental impact assessment for the area (a Council decision) the proposal for high rise buildings out of keeping with the area and the prospect of ten years building work. It is likely that CANForum will address these issues as well as the rights of the current tenants of the estate. Comments and suggestions welcome.

Maire Lowe ● 3326d