Forum Topic

LNWH NHS Trust Ealing Hospital

The long-term future of Ealing Hospital has been a topic of discussion and speculation for some time now. Media coverage and campaign groups have suggested that the hospital is due to close under recently published plans, referring to the North West London Sustainability and Transformation Plan (STP).We want to reassure our staff, patients, partners and residents that Ealing Hospital is NOT closing and there will be no immediate changes to the services it provides.While Ealing Hospital will undergo transformation to a new-style local hospital, these changes will take place over the next 3-5 years following extensive engagement. As previously described the proposed changes are based on providing services at Ealing Hospital that most people use most often, such as outpatients, minor procedures, diagnostics and urgent care for less serious cases. Proposed new services such as a frail elderly service and extended ambulatory care pathways will also be introduced. This is NOT about money. We are working with partners to ensure the necessary investment is in place to allow the service changes to take place in a safe and sustainable way. We have been clear from the start that improved out-of-hospital and preventative care must be in place before any service changes take place at Ealing Hospital.We are very much at the beginning of this process and there remains a lot of work ahead. In the coming months we will be engaging with our staff, patients, partners and local residents in order to develop exactly what Ealing Hospital will look like in the future.- See more at: http://www.lnwh.nhs.uk/about-us/news-and-media/latest-news/the-future-of-ealing-hospital/#sthash.0sTXUw2S.dpuf

Don Kelly ● 3259d12 Comments

Thank you Maire for posting this information. This is an exceptionally disappointing statement from Cllr. Morrissey for a number of reasons.The Labour leaflet I received detailed the plans for the closure of the district general hospital at Ealing, which has been confirmed by the NHS and has been the subject of an ongoing cross-party campaign since 2011. Cllr. Morrissey voted against the Labour Party's Council motion on this matter in April. This is not a lie - merely a statement of fact.I have already outlined in this thread why the statement from North West London's Trust is highly misleading and I would like to hear from Cllr. Morrissey herself which 'blatant lies and scaremongering' she alleges have been put before the public and what her own position is. If she is simply now defending the STP and national Conservative Party policy, then she should say so.I would suggest that, by refusing to engage with the debate and calling her opponents liars, it seems Cllr. Morrissey wants the extremely contentious issue of the local hospital cuts and closures to go away. I'm afraid it won't.In any case, if Cllr. Morrissey believes that people are lying about her, misrepresenting her voting record or her personal views, surely the best way to challenge that is in several public debates - especially at the long-established CCA hustings that she had previously accepted an invitation to attend? If she does not do that, the 'only price worth paying' will be in the minds of voters who may consider, as I do, that she is hiding from the electorate.

Sarah Woolmer ● 3258d

Thank you Don for posting this hugely misleading statement from London North West Hospitals Trust on the forum this evening. I wonder what your motivation was.The statement does not directly address the substance of the concern of Acton residents about the future of Ealing's health service. I note that it does not explicitly state what Acton Central residents heard at the ward forum from the Trust representatives, Tessa Sandall and Simon Crawford, that Ealing District General Hospital will close and a local hospital will replace it. This has also been confirmed by the Trust's Director of Communications, Christian Cubitt - a former press secretary to David Cameron - at the Ealing Council Health Adults and Social Services Scrutiny Panel.The statement also doesn't detail the fact the Sustainability and Transformation Plan, forced on local residents by the CCGs, will see the end of blue light ambulance services, critical care and surgery at Ealing. The plan submitted to the Treasury is designed to cut more than £1bn from Ealing's health spending.The plan also cuts the number of beds at Ealing hospital from 288 to 50 - a reduction of more than 80 per cent.Rather than consulting with the public, the NHS tried to force the leaders of Ealing and Hammersmith and Fulham Council to sign up to the document without allowing them to read it beforehand. It is, in my view, to their immense credit that these politicians decided against doing that and have launched cross-party campaigners to save west London's hospital services.The NHS have been clear throughout that they will be engaging rather than consulting with the public. Ms. Sandall and Mr. Crawford caused uproar at the Acton Central ward forum I attended when they ended the questioning by insisting that the public's opposition to these plans would not be reflected upon and the plan would continue to be implemented.As for consulting with the public, the CCG were given the contact details of 17 Ealing residents groups in November who would be interested in hearing more about these proposals. The CCG promised the Council's Health Scrutiny panel that they would be in touch with these residents associations. To date, they have heard nothing.I would suggest that the residents of Acton who depend on these important local services think twice before they believe a selective statement from a Trust whose financial future depends on these proposals going forward - especially as the same organisations were responsible for the shambolic Shaping a Healthier Future proposals that scrapped essential services across Acton and failed to deliver either the savings or the improvement in patient standards that were promised.

Sarah Woolmer ● 3259d