Forum Topic

Planning: 180224FUL - Phase 1 - Former Ealing, Hammersmith & West London College, Gunnersbury Lane,

Below is copied from the covering letter in the applicationPhase 1 - Former Ealing, Hammersmith & West London College, Gunnersbury Lane, ACTON, W3 8UX.“Application for full planning permission for the erection of a part-two/part-three storey academic building (Class D1, non-residential institution) for education use as a secondary school including dining hall, outdoor play space, new car parking area and other associated works”.This proposal is part of a wider package of works which seeks to redevelop the Site for mixed-use educational and residential development.Phase 1, which is the subject of this planning application, will comprise the construction of a new school building on Gunnersbury Lane capable of accommodating 180 students. This building is set to open as a school in September 2019. A temporary kitchen unit will be constructed to the rear of the Phase 1 building until Phase 2 opens.Phase 2, which will be the subject of a forthcoming application, will include the demolition of the remaining existing college buildings and the construction of the main school facility for a total of 1,200 students plus circa 100 new residential units in three towers (6 – 9 storeys) above the main school building. This building is set to open as a school in September 2020.https://pam.ealing.gov.uk/online-applications/centralDistribution.do?caseType=Application&keyVal=P2OWZIJMJUV00

Paul Webster ● 2993d20 Comments

From the anti academies alliance: Raising Standards?The government’s claim that academies are raising standards and that their results are improving faster than in other schools is not proven because the data is kept secret. Furthermore, such data that it has been possible to acquire indicates that the government’s claim is wide open to critical challenge.Selective AdmissionsCovert and overt admissions and exclusion practices enable academies to skew their intakes in favour of those from higher-achieving backgrounds.Local authorities can ‘direct’ maintained schools to accept special needs and looked-after children but can only ‘ask’ academies.Increased ExclusionsThere is increasing evidence of academies excluding more children than maintained schools.Evading Education LawAcademies are not covered by general education law which means that their students and parents have fewer rights than those of schools in the maintained sector.  Academies should be brought under the umbrella of general education law and the recently published education and skills bill should be the vehicle used to achieve this.No DemocracyRushed, flawed and manipulated consultation processes show a complete disregard of the views of local people. There is no democratic ballot for parents and teachers within the consultation process.Governance ArrangementsThe sponsor has the power to appoint the majority of governors.Academies are only required to appoint one parent and one staff governor and they are rarely representative of the communities they are supposed to serve.Staff Terms and ConditionsAcademies have high staff turnover rates, and staff in academies can be prey to discriminatory employment practices. Teachers and support staff working in academies deserve the same protection as those working in the maintained sector.The Power of the SponsorThe sponsor gains almost absolute power once a school acquires academy status. They take control of public assets – the buildings and the land.Social SegregationOECD research suggests that where schools systems have a greater diversity of types of school, there is a greater tendency towards more social segregation.An Unproven ExperimentThe academy programme remains hotly contested. Lord Hattersley has warned that academies will create a ‘hierarchy’ of schools.

Chris Hurley ● 2953d