Forum Topics

England needs a design quality unit, consortium insists

Any chance LBE will take notice?The government should set up a dedicated Design Quality Unit for England to build on the work of the Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission (BBBBC).This is the conclusion of a consortium of organisations comprising the Academy of Urbanism, Civic Voice, CPRE, Design Council, Place Alliance, Trees & Design Action Group, UCL and Urban Design Group. Citing the Housing Design Audit for England, which The Planner reported on in January this year, the consortium noted that there has been a systematic failure to deliver good quality urban development across England for “decades”, particularly in new developments.The coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic has “emphasised how critical a high-quality built environment is to our everyday sense of wellbeing and how disadvantaged those are who suffer poor conditions inside and out”. This disadvantage could be manifested through poor quality green space and poor access to local facilities. Building on the BBBBC’s work the consortium says government has a “once in a generation” opportunity to show “real” leadership and ambition to make a change.In Delivering Urban Quality, Time to Get Serious, the consortium explains that it will be difficult to deliver the BBBBC’s proposals “without a determined and public effort” by the government, which should harness the knowledge and commitment of the built environment sector. The consortium recommends that a properly resource Design Quality Unit should be set up in England. It should be based on a partnership and networked approach across the country in order to monitor, challenge, inspire and help to deliver “real change”.In a statement, the consortium invited other organisations and individuals to join this call for action. Delivering Urban Quality, Time to Get Serious, can be found at http://placealliance.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Place-Alliance-A-Design-Unit-for-England-Pamphlet_Final.pdf28 May 2020 - Laura Edgar, The Plannerhttps://www.planningportal.co.uk/news/article/712/planning_news_-_4_june_2020?utm_source=PPQ+Newsletter&utm_campaign=77f4c2728e-Newsletter_16042020_HTML_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_734e0b63a9-77f4c2728e-7282665#one

Rosco White ● 2334d1 Comments ● 2328d

NAJSAREK and BELL

An open letter for Julian Bell.Dear Julian Bell,We have again had contact with Mr Najsarek and again have cause to doubt his integrity and suitability to occupy the post of CEO.  The question of how he managed to gain employment with Ealing Council will not go away. In February 2016, when he was appointed, you wrote: “I am delighted that we have been able to attract someone of Paul’s calibre to Ealing …Paul has an excellent record of achievement in local government”.: All we knew of his record in his previous appointment in Bolton was that he had been in his post there a short while.On June 30 2016, we learned from the national press, that, when he applied for his job here in Ealing, he had taken legal action to prevent his behaviour in his previous employment becoming known.  His “record of achievement” in Bolton was a front-page scandal: he was, it seemed from the reports, a financial liability and a man who could not be trusted to keep his word.  We had been sold or you had bought for us the CEO equivalent of a “dodgy motor”.  Ealing Council did not even see fit to comment on the disquieting disclosure. We cannot blame you for Mr Najsarek’s appointment if you were deceived as we were.  The question is: Were you? Did you already know anything of what appeared in the press on June 30 2016 in respect of Mr Najsarek’s behaviour in Bolton when you appointed him? “Yes” or “No” will do by way of a response, for now.  Your sincerely,Andrew Farmer

Andrew Farmer ● 2331d0 Comments ● 2331d