Forum Topic

very sorry to hear about these awful proposals. My 3 kids used to be at Derwentwater until we moved away at the end of last August. I was a Governor of Derwentwater for 5 years until last year.I am unsurprised to hear the total opposition from parents to these proposals. Derwentwater is already absolutely stretched for space. There is not enough room already and these proposals will seriously compromise the school's ability to function.In my role as a governor I became concerned about how the premises were operating already. There is no lift in the main building so there is no access to the 1st or 2nd floors for anyone who is in a wheelchair. When I asked to see the assessment for disabled access to the premises I was shocked to read that it says anyone with a mobility impairment is banned from the 1st and 2nd floors of the building. The plan for evacuation of mobility impaired people from the 1st and 2nd floors in emergency states that there is no plan for this, as disabled people aren't allowed up! There are no signs for this and no warning of it too in the premises and no-one seems aware of this. I raised this issue with the Head and the Governors and the Chair of the Premises Committee, Vlod Barchuk, was supposed to get an expert audit done, but as far as I could tell, he never did anything about it. He didn't seem to be concerned about the problem or the risks. I'm afraid I got the impression he didn't really care about the issue at all.Last year one of the pupils was confined to a wheelchair due to a medical condition. As a result of the lack of access she was unable to access teaching in her classroom. Not good.I'm surprised we haven't heard on this thread from Vlod Barchuk who as well as being a governor and the chair of the Premises Committee at Derwentwate is also local councillor.I'd like to know what he did about these proposals. When they were suggested by the Council, did he point out they were crazy and would be over-congesting the school, and add to the already unsatisfactory state of safety, particularly regarding the upper floors in the main building? Vlod is up for re-election very soon and should be accountable for what he has done as a councillor.Derwentwater desperately needs more space rather than less. If this proposal is implemented there would be inadequate playground space. There is already no grass at all and no field on the premises, which is very unsatisfactory. The physical limitations are an issue at Derwentwater. However I wish to make clear I think it is a really excellent school, and the teaching and learning is excellent, and strongly improving under the new Head. The future for Derwentwater is extremely bright provided these crazy plans are fought off. I am very sorry I am not there to help campaign at the election to help throw out this rotten bunch of useless Tories. And Vlod is the best they have!!

Peter Todd ● 6025d

Dear PeterIf only you’d googled my name 3 times whilst standing inside a hologram of a pentangle, then I would of course have appeared on this forum instantly in all my eloquence and persuasiveness. Otherwise it can take me a couple of days to find time between work/Council meetings/nearly having a life to respond.I’ve never called you a ‘commie pinko troublemaker’ because you are not; you’re a member of the Labour party who, when he resided in Acton, sometimes did some sub Alistair Campbell (no, it wasn’t that good – sub Damian McBride) nuLabour spinning on this wonderful forum and I sometimes rose to the bait and responded – I like to think neither of us bored forum regulars too much with our political knockabout. But there are elections coming which no doubt explains why you choose to throw mud at me in the hope that some of it sticks. So to the substance of your posts…As those who have contacted me about the proposed temporary expansion know, I have supported the governors’ opposition to expansion of the school and have made it clear that I will assist in arguing for alternatives to these particular proposals. There is a lot of pressure on school places this year, from numerous causes of which one is the greater percentage of pupils staying in the state sector (recession means fewer parents can afford to send their kids to private schools). But temporary expansion at Derwentwater is not a done deal. I’m in regular contact with the chair of governors as to how best to make the school’s case on this matter. As to lift access to the upper floors, you know as well as I do that neither the previous or current headteacher have pushed this as a priority for improvements at the school. You also know that, notwithstanding the education spending increases under this government, the six figure sum required for this work does not, and has never, existed. You should also know that, in case of fire, standard advice is not to use lifts - so emergency arrangements would have to take account of any disabled child above ground floor being carried down stairs. And you would also know that the school undertakes regular fire drills to check that all children can quickly and safely exit the building if required to do so. To imply in your email that I don’t care about disabled children is cheap. And nasty.

Vlod Barchuk ● 6023d

Further to Joanna Harvey and K J Pearce's comments, I too am genuinely interested as to why the new school planned is to be a Catholic school, when obviously the increase will cover children from a broad spectrum of religious and non religious backgrounds.  Are all the influx of new children predicted to be of a Catholic background? As we know its hard to get into a religious school unless you can demonstrate a good background in the religion, in spite of the percentages of other faiths or non faiths they have to take.If when the Catholic school is built, will it be sufficient and accepting of all the different denominations of school children, if there are not enough Catholic children to fill the spaces?  It seems to be further promoting the elitism generated by faith schools through their admissions policy, rather than tackling the bigger issue at large of providing a place in good education for children whatever their religious beliefs i.e a general state primary school. Is it to do with allocated funding available and or stipulations related to allocated funds for the new school? With regards to Derwentwater primary school, it has already been deemed unsuitable for permanent expansion, so why it would be deemed OK(!?) to be suitable and therefore detrimental for 7 long years of a certain number of children's educational life, (and probably more once the huts hit the floor), seems illogical, aswell as extremely flippant to those children whose education it will effect.  Derwentwater for all its hard work seems to be the easy target to 'expediate' a permanent problem.  The school has come on leaps and bounds in recent years but I have already spoken to parents living nearby of children in nursery years, that have said this has has been a decisive factor in deciding not to put their children into the school and look at moving out of the area entirely.  This can't be good for Acton on the whole and for the future, as regeneration works on many levels.

Sarah Jones ● 6023d

Iain Muir - it is Ealing Council that has proposed a new build Catholic school in Acton. Their cabinet paper regarding the expansion of primary school places recommends permanent expansion to East Acton primary and the construction of a new Catholic primary projected to open in 2012. The main driver for the latter appears to be that the Catholic Church wants to expand and has a site available. It's an expedient option.I have strong concerns about the development of another denominational school.  We  still have no compelling evidence that St Vincent's is heavily over-subscribed by children from the local area.  A Catholic primary has no catchment area criteria - it isn't a solution to the local problem. Although the school would take a percentage of children from other faith backgrounds, children from non-faith families would be excluded.The council's response is very inconsistent. At last Friday's meeting, they stated that one reason for ruling out West Acton for temporary expansion was because they didn’t want children commuting all the way (!!) from Central Acton to West Acton. However, when challenged after the meeting as why Acton needs a second Catholic primary school, Laurence Field (Programme Manager for Primary Places) responded that this was a school build designed to meet the needs of the Catholic community across the whole borough....no commuting issues there then.With regard to Iain’s comment about Educational Nimbyism:  I really don’t think that’s a valid point in this particular debate.  Derwentwater School is full to capacity – absolutely nobody disputes this, even the council that wants to temporarily expand it. I have enormous sympathy for parents who can’t get a place for their child at Derwentwater, but compromising the progress of an entire school population is not a sensible solution.

KJ Pierce ● 6023d

I think what is really interesting - and depressing - about all this is the context to what is going on. Acton has found itself at the centre of a national debate courtesy of Toby Young's attempts to start a new experiment in education by setting up a local free school. One of the arguments against Toby's school has been that local comprehensives don't do well because middle class parents don't invest in them. But Derwentwater is in the opposite situation. This is a primary school where some of the local parents could probably afford to send their children to private education, but they are choosing not to. Instead they are sending them to a local school, the most overcrowded school in Acton, the one with the lowest Ofsted rating - essentially because they believe in the school. This in turn is having an impact on driving up standards for everybody. Nor is it just middle class parents who are behind this. If you want to meet some of the most motivated parents - go and meet some of  the Somali mums. If you actually stop and think about it - what is going on at Derwentwater is genuinely remarkable  - and the school inspires real loyalty and affection among parents.. For example, just  take a look at this thread on Mumsnet which pre-dates the current row: http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/primary/913052-Primary-Schools-in-Acton-London And that is one of the reasons why people are SO angry. Because it feels that all of this is about to be compromised by an expedient policy that Ealing could have been thinking about 4 years ago. The school is at capacity - other schools in walking distance have more space and moreover are willing to expand. Finally it is probably worth mentioning that this is actually a row that affects EVERYONE in Acton - not just parents with children at the school. Successful schools are integral to successful communities. It is what makes people want to move and live in those communities and to invest in them. Ealing - because of a policy that feels more like a dodgy, last-minute O-level essay than a carefully thought through plan - is in danger of chucking all this away.

Richard Grange ● 6022d

Last night in the Rocket, a pub in Acton, a group of angry parents met to discuss how to fight Ealing Council’s plan to stick a Portakabin in the playground of Derwentwater Primary School. Derwentwater is a three form entry school — that is to say, it is already the most cramped school in Acton. Ealing’s plan is to stick a Portakabin in the playground, enabling the school to admit an extra class in 2010 and possibly in 2011 as well. If you include Derwentwater Nursery, this will take the number of children at the school up to 785, making it larger than the secondary school I’m trying to set up. The effect of this expansion on the children already at the school is neatly illustrated by this YouTube video (see above) made by one of the Derwentwater parents.The parents’ fury is directed at Ealing Council, which is understandable, but the local authority has been wrong-footed by the unanticipated baby boom. Between 2004-06, births in Ealing jumped from 4,643 to 5,007 and last year rose to 5,445. This is a nationwide phenomenon, as the Telegraph reported last week. Britain will need to find an additional more 549,000 primary school places within the next eight years to cope with the increased demand:    According to projections published yesterday by the Department for Children, Schools and Families, there are currently 3,992,000 pupils aged under 11 in state-funded nursery and primary schools.    It said numbers were expected to grow year-on-year to 4,541,000 in 2018 – an additional 549,000. It will be the biggest number of pupils in the system since the late-70s.    The rise would be equivalent to around 2,300 average-sized primary schools, or an additional 18,300 classes of 30 pupils.Projecting future births is an inexact science and most local authorities will, like Ealing, be looking at temporary solutions. After all, Ealing doesn’t want to build any new primary schools in Acton if the expanding birth rate is a blip rather than a long-term trend. But if the mood at the Rocket yesterday is anything to go by, parents simply won’t stand for Portakabins being put in school playgrounds, particularly if there are no guarantees that they won’t become permanent structures.A more practical solution would be to take the problem off Ealing Council’s hands by allowing parent groups to set up schools themselves and lease the premises. If the birth rate remains high, they could continue to lease the buildings; if it starts to fall, they could end the leases and close the schools. Not as cheap as sticking Portakabins in school playgrounds, perhaps, but a good deal cheaper than building new schools.The difficulties being experienced by the Derwentwater parents is a perfect illustration of the need for a new secondary school in Acton. The demand for more primary school places will shortly translate in a demand for more secondary school places and if no new school is set up to accommodate this demand the Council will have to put Portakabins in the area’s three comprehensive schools, too. My solution — which is to set up a new school in a leased building — is surely preferable. (You can watch a YouTube video about my plans here.) No matter which party wins the general election, the DCSF should allow parent groups to set up schools in leased buildings up and down the country.

Sara Nathan ● 6021d