Forum Topic

Election musings

I think the Tories think they've got Ealing Central & Acton in the bag, but I wonder what effect their negative campaign ads will have. I for one am getting fed up of seeing their posters with the picture of Gordon Brown with the unsubtle headline round almost every corner. I would have thought they would have been better served spending the money on pictures of Cameron waffling on about vision, a new Britain, mending the broken society etc. I think the Tories may also be hit by the misdemeanours of their council - the new developments planned for Ealing town centre, the proposed extension of Derwentwater School etc. Personally I'm not that keen on Gordon Brown. But I am amazed at the ingratitude of all the old people. Every newspaper and radio phone in seem to have at least one pensioner complaining about the Government - yet the old aged pensions/pension credit have gone up 100%, not to mention free TV licenses, the winter fuel grant, the vast expenditure on the NHS, and now the plans to pay for everyone's nursing care. It just goes to show, it doesn't really matter how much you do, people will still complain and vote on who looks nicest on TV.Conversely I'm amazed that more attempts haven't been made to mobilise the younger generation. People in their 20s have been totally shafted by the Blair/Brown 50+ generation. The latter got everything on a plate - free university places, student grants etc and they responded by saddling the next generation with vast unpayable debts, load paid jobs, an impossible housing ladder while preparing the way for their own impending twilight years. I suppose the youngsters have themselves to blame for their apathy. If they won't vote you can't blame politicians for ignoring them.Finally, I am amazed at Nick Clegg's impact in the debate. As soon as he started speaking I thought to myself, here we go again. Liberal nice guy saying how the others should stop slagging each other off and work together etc. No more yah boo politics. The reason the others argue is that they have got something to argue about. What's the point of having a debate if you're not allowed to disagree or argue your point.

Patrick Gray ● 5996d14 Comments

"A big impact on pensions that seems to be forgotten was the 'holiday' that many companies took at the same time on paying in their share of the contributions, adding to the underfunding. On top of that was the push by the Tories to promote personal pensions as against final salary schemes - a basic fraud on working people."The facts don't really bear out this view:1. The thing that really did for the pension schemes was the change to tax on dividends which served to reduce the re-investment returns i.e. less dividends went back into schemes thus compromising long term performance2. The accounting rules were changed to require that firms look at funding over a 3 year window despite the very strong warnings at the time that this would result in schemes closing during periods of economic slow down.On both of these points Gordon Brown ignored expert advice and ploughed on regardless - per his refusal to accept advice from the Bank of England not to dump our national gold reserve onto the market all at once and at a low price.The final point is that it's been patently clear since the mid 1980's that defined benefit schemes are not affordable due to the extended period people now live into retirement. The simple economics bear this out - how can a member of the armed forces or policeman retire after 20 / 30 years on full benefits and be funded at 2/3 their salary for the next 40-60 years? Defined contribution schemes are the only affordable option - and our reluctance to accept that explains why we are now heading towards a £1.4 trillion pension liability for the public sector and minimum tax rises of £10B every year just to make up the shorfalls.

Ed Yelland ● 5996d