Forum Topic

'The first £100 or so that you think you are donating to the charity actually goes to these people'Hmm, not sure where you're getting your numbers from. Of course, a tiny percentage of what you pay goes to the company that employs these 'chuggers'. Just as I used to work for a marketing company that - shock horror - used to charge charities for designing and writing fundraising packs that pulled in thousands of pounds. But guess what? You have to spend money to make money. Just as we used to raise far more than we charged charities, these fundraisers pull in far more than they cost.  Guess what else? Signing people on the street is still one of the most effective and cost-efficient ways for charities to gain much-needed donors. You think that, even without them, some of your money wouldn't go to admin? Of course it would. Face it - the real reason you're trying to 'expose' these chuggers is because you can't handle the guilt of not helping. As for your revelations, these chuggers make it quite clear themselves how much money they're paid when they talk to you on the street. And I can tell you that they do exactly the same thing on the telephone. Which is a lot more transparent than a whole bunch of the charities, themselves. Perhaps if you actually bothered to give a measly £2-3 a month to people like the Red Cross, you'd actually be able to get rid of these chuggers straight away, if they really bother you so much. Or do you think £2-3 a month is too much to give to a charity like the Red Cross? Or Shelter? Or Mind? Or ActionAid? Or the NSPCC? Or Barnardo's? Pesky charities and their overheads, eh?

Hayes Thompson ● 5944d