Forum Topic

It is indeed, although it gives a whole new dimension to the idea of 'the wrong side of the tracks!' I stumbled on the programme by accident, I missed the start, but I did find it interesting. For me, both the strength and weakness of the show was its almost exclusive focus on Toby Young himself: a strength, because one felt one got to know him a little; a weakness, because, whatever the genesis of the local plan, it surely is not to stand or fall on the basis of the ambitions and preferences of one man, however strong his personality. It was clear, however, that the film-makers see the commercial potential of their episodic offerings as being very much based on viewing life through Toby's eyes (as the 'famous' one.) I would be loth to draw conclusions from the programme as to the philosophy or objectives of other members of the WLFS group; suffice to say that, at best, the editing didn't do them any favours in rebutting suggestions of narrowly based self-interest. I came to the view that Toby Young does have good intentions on diversity of intake, but I didn't pick that up from others and, as a teacher pointed out to him, the school will be inundated with applications from affluent parents for whom that agenda is in no sense a priority. I agree with the comments that we never got to the bottom of what the school is for or why it would be a valuable addition to our society (as opposed to a cheap alternative to private school for the urban middle-class.) The tantalising 'to be continued' nature of the ending is what gave me real pause for thought. Just eleven months from now, the WLFS group says it wants to be educating some of our young people. It doesn't have premises (anyone know where the secret 'building that looks like a school' actually is? Hounslow?), therefore all of the other obstacles ahead of it - infrastructure, governance, numbers, head teacher, staff, curriculum - can't be resolved. Yes, it has the political wind in its sails, and that nice Mr Gove is very keen to throw our money at it (while withholding it from a new state school in the north of the borough), but even if one wished the project well - and I don't - it all looks very rushed.Doubtless all will be revealed in due course.

Steve Donnelly ● 5828d

Toby, I certainly don't believe in personalising these things although, as I said earlier in the thread, I'm not sure that the nature of the programme did you, or your group, any favours in that regard.I guess it's a compliment that you've been granted satanic status, but it's not wholly surprising that you're seen to embody the free school movement, given the number of newspaper and magazine articles by and about you, plus all the TV and radio you've done. You're seen as a determined and energetic operator; one with good contacts, and one that's used to getting what he wants when he sets his mind to it. Who you are, and where we live, have served to boil up a high profile and sometimes unpleasant debate. If people have kicked back at you personally that's to be regretted, but I'm afraid was a predictable result of you coming to be seen as the 'leader' of the whole free school movement (a role I'm sure you did not seek and do not want.)For my part, as I also said earlier, I believe that you're sincere. But if some of your opponents have caricatured you as dead set upon the destruction of state education as we know it, so some us us have felt our opposition represented by you as luddite and regressive. We too are sincere: sincere in believing that your school (and its ilk) will destabilise state education across our community; sincere in believing that, whatever your intentions, your idea will be annexed by the affluent; sincere in believing, after seeing the programme, that for all your irrepressible energy, your group is not ready to run a school.Whatever happens, Free School or no, life will go on, and all of us in Acton will have to get on with it. In my personal daydream, Toby Young will become an influential parent governor at Acton High, and the school, replete with new 16+ building, will become the envy of London. Who knows? Meantime, although I wouldn't open your school, I'd gladly buy you a pint should we bump into each other...

Steve Donnelly ● 5826d

Thanks for the thoughtful response Steve. I didn't mean to come across as defensive – but the vitriol can be quite vicious sometimes. To give just one example, a BBC radio disc jockey tweeted the following while watching the programme: "I don’t think there’s been one person yet on Toby Young’s BBC2 documentary about starting a school that I wouldn’t happily punch to death." That was a little upsetting given that all four of my children were seen throughout the documentary.I don't doubt your sincerity and I thank you for not doubting mine. Let me reassure you on a couple of points. You say that the West London Free School will destabilise state education across our community. In fact, we are taking great pains to minimise any disruption our school is likely to cause. We're in more or less constant touch now with officers and members in Ealing, Hounslow and Hammersmith and Fulham and we take any concerns they express very seriously. To give just one example, we want the majority of the children at our school to be admitted by lottery so we won't just be sourcing pupils from the local community. No danger, then, that any of the local schools will become undersubscribed as a result of our school opening.You said that my group didn't look ready to run a school, judging from the documentary, but that's a little unfair given that our group now includes John Macintosh who ran the London Oratory very successfully for 29 years. But, as you know, it won't be my group running the school. John is helping us recruit a head teacher and, once he or she is in place, we'll jointly recruit a Senior Management Team. They're the people who'll be running the school. Some of us will probably become governors, but nearly every school in the country has at least one parent governor. I don't suppose the governance of our school and the way it's run will be very different from the way most other schools operate, including Acton High School.Your third point, that there is a danger that the school will be hijacked by the affluent, is a good one. Another reason for proposing to admit a majority of students by lottery is that it will prevent middle class parents effectively buying a place at the school by moving into the catchment area. Of course, it's possible that middle class parents will be more likely to enter the lottery than non-middle class parents, but we hope to combat that with our communications strategy. Expect to get a leaflet about the school through your door in the not too distant future. There may be other things we can do to ensure it has a broad and fully inclusive intake, too. Michael Gove has talked about changing the Admissions Code to allow schools to give priority to applicants who are eligible for Free School Meals. If he does, we'll certainly take advantage of that mechanism.I honestly believe that a lot of your fears about the likely impact of our school – both on the children who go there and on those at surrounding schools – are misplaced. Time will tell, but I hope that thoughtful, sensible people such as yourself will eventually come to approve of the West London Free School.

Toby Young ● 5826d