Forum Topic

'The artist, John Aldus was selected from a short list.21 pots of varying shape and design, but all the same colour will be sited around the centre of Acton. The pots will not all be at street level. The pots will be filled with earth from oak forests around Great Britian (this part may change) They will not be planted.''Profile of artist: French, works and lives in LondonSculptor, painter, photographer and multimedia artist engaged in examining the role of art and its mechanisms in contemporary society.After graduating from the Ecole des Art Decoratifs and the Ecole des Beaux-Arts in Switzerland in 1961, he was awarded many grants during the following years.  His first museum exhibition in 1965 included both paintings and drawings.In parallel, to subsidize his living he has worked as an architectural draughtsman, graphic designer, theatre and film stage designer and has done some teaching (e.g. invited professor for one year in the Ecole Superieure d’Art Visuel, Lausanne in 1985).John Aldus’ work articulates a basic reflection on the role of the artist in compemporary society.  Art, for him, is an observation point, which affords a critical look at our social context and invites the viewer to reflect on its values and workings.Solo exhibitions in France, Switzerland, Belgium, Canada, UK, USA, Germany, including: Warburg Institute, London; Fal Gallery, London; Palais des Beaux Arts, Brussels; Musee Rath, Geneva; Robert L Brown Gallery, New York; Veith Turske Gallery, Cologne; Arte Arena Gallery, Zurich; Blancpain-Stepczynski Gallery, Geneva.Group exhibitions in France, Switzerland, Belgium, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, Poland, UK, Greece, Israel, Egypt, Spain, Italy, USA, Argentina, Chile, Brazil, Venezuela, Japan, including: Prince’s Foundation, London; Architectural Association, London; Contemporary Art Museum, Geneva; Contemporary Art Centre, Barcelona; Barbican Centre, London; Nouveau Musee, Lyons; Kunsthalle, Manheim; Museum of the XXth Century, Vienna; Louisiana, Copenhagen; Palais de Beaux Arts, Brussels; Musee de Beaux Arts, Athens; Musee des Beaux Arts;, Tel Aviv; Musee des Beaux Arts, Cairo; Pratt Institute, New York; Kunsthaus, Zurich; Kunsthalle, Bern; Kunsthalle, Basle; Kunsthalle, Basle; Kunst Museum, Bochum; Grand Palais, Paris; Gallery Numero, Firenze.Current public project: Installation of a permanent art piece in Marchmont Street, Bloomsbury which establishes a parallel between the philanthropy of Thomas Coram an eighteenth century merchant,founder of the Foundling Hospital, and today’s concerns'

Dee Cook ● 5390d

I agree with you Anne, the pots will no doubt be used for all sorts of reasons but perhaps not in a positive way. I feel it is a complete waste of money and a rather strange idea to have 21 pots scattered around Acton filled with soil from various forests!I am sure there are many more positive ways to enhance the appearance and attraction of Acton but I'm afraid I really don't think this is one of them.Perhaps these 21 pots would look great in a different location and a different setting but hardly appropriate for Acton W3.The shop fronts could certainly benefit from some improvement, especially those which have been empty for some time, for instance the property next door to Barclays Bank which had an infestation of rats in the past. The empty restaurant across the road next to The George & Dragon, which has had a few owners (previously So Asia).It is nice to see a few new shops but a lot more could be done to imnprove Acton High Street. The building next to The Windmill Pub should have been the subject of a Compulsary Purchase Order long ago instead of allowing the owners to neglect the frontage the way it has been over many years. Ealing Council now plans to spend money trying to hide the building by superimposing a picture of a tree on it. This might be OK as a temporary measure but it is unbgelievable that the owners have been allowed to neglect this property for a long as I can remember.No matter which administration is running Ealing Council nothing has been done to force the owners to clean up their act. With the great demand for additioal housing it is a shame that this matter has not been addressed. With a little bit of imagination the money could be put to greater use in this area.

Jean F Fernandez ● 5390d

I have a few comments to make about all of this - more in sorrow than anger (but there's a lot of anger nevertheless!):Jeffries House (aka Beechworth House)This is owned by the enormous property company Freshwater Property Management. They are notorious for allowing buildings to lie empty for decades and rot (as has happened with Jeffries House) - I think it's an accountancy/tax wheeze. A few years ago, the Acton Business Forum tried to get Freshwaters to enter into a dialogue about the building's future, but they simply fobbed us off. The council seems to have had more success - I understand that they've been having pre-planning application talks with the company about Jeffries House. Compulsory purchase seems to be off the table. The council refuses to countenance it (except, that is, if you're a petrol station by North Acton station…).Would it be worth having the oak tree artwork in the windows of Jeffries House? In my opinion, this is an absolute yes! Even if it is for only two years (the minimum amount of time it would take for something positive to happen to the building), it would make that part of the High Street beautiful rather than an embarrassment. But given Freshwater's track record, we might have this beautiful oak tree for decades to come!Shop frontsAll the money we're getting has to be spent by 31 March, or at least the work that it is being used to pay for has to be set in motion by then. It has taken the council regeneration team years to get even a few owners of shop fronts to agree to upgrade them (many of Acton's shops have tiers of owners, who are often impossible to contact). The deadline has also stopped lots of other  terrific ideas from being taken further. The potsI'm increasingly unhappy with what is, in effect, being imposed on Acton with absolutely no input from residents and businesses, except for a few meetings with them that ticks required boxes for the council.I wasn't enamoured with the idea of 21 pots round Acton. Like others, I wondered what in the world this had to do with the town. (I think it relates to vessels to hold water, as Acton has lots of springs…) But then I talked to Vicki Barker, one of the managers of APPLE, the fantastic charity dealing with children and young people in Acton Park, who has already commented on this forum. Unlike me, she really got the idea. Suppose, she said, 21 different parts of Acton - organisations, local communities, churches, the mosque, schools, etc. - each took charge of one of the pots (which could be about a metre high - big planters, in fact). They could decorate them (mosaics, painting, you name it - as long as it was durable) to reflect them and their part of Acton, and then they could plant something appropriate in the pot and look after it - and 'own' that pot. There's a wall just off Churchfield Road where we could have a mosaic map showing all 21 pots, with a brief description of what each one represents and who worked on them, to wrap up the whole project. And children, young people, old people - all the generations could work on it and get involved.Now that really got me enthused. And if people like Vicki and APPLE could be involved, I knew that the results would be creative and practical and would be done on time. This vision was spelled out to the artist and the council team working on the art project.So what are we getting? 21 pots, all the same colour, randomly strewn around the High Street, filled with dirt from elsewhere and left to grow weeds. What a waste!And what really makes me angry is that all this is being imposed on the people of Acton as if we are 'natives' and the artist/council are 'missionaries' come to teach us 'culture'. At no point were we consulted before the artist was commissioned and the project were signed and sealed. Not only do we have creative youth organisations like APPLE, we have dozens and dozens of artists living here who could have contributed. Even with the tight deadline - or even because of it - agreement could have been achieved to have something that (1) would have reflected life in Acton and (2) would have been at least partly created by the people of Acton. But we were never even given the chance. So shame on Nick O'Donnell and his team in the council!Oh, and why are there 21 pots? According to one of the council team, 'that number means a lot to the artist' …Where is the money coming from?Someone blamed Ealing's Labour council for 'wasting money on silly projects'. Although I do blame some council employees for wasting this opportunity to let our community show what it can do (see above), the money for the project has actually come from Boris Johnson and his Mayor's Outer London Fund - hardly Labour.

Nancy Duin ● 5388d

Re the pots project:I am practising artist,film-maker and tv producer resident  in Acton.  I work on projects with young people for Apple from time to time.  So I know how much talent and potential there is around here and how exceptional indivdiuals like Vicki Barker, Joy Goddard and their team are able to develop that talent, and how they could contribute to a precious opportunity such as this.  I am also aware of the great work done by Rachel Pepper and the Arts Forum.  (However, I'm not a public art practioner, (so the following isn't axe grinding.)  There is always a case for high quality, well-thought out, thoroughly researched  public art and 'socially engaged practice' which involves and develops local talent and encourages engagement with the arts and the wider community.It would have been great to see that in action here, with some real funding behind it. Judging by the marketing excercise at the Christmas Fair, this project seems to have been put together very hurriedly, the research has been rather shallow and the idea has little connection with contemporary Acton which is really meaningful to the residents. There is no genuine scope for invovlement in devising or delivering the project as it was very clear that the concept is firmly in place, with no flexibility.  (The stand at the Fair was not in that sense a consultation).  On questioning the artist and the guy from, presumably, the arts consultancy, Modus Operandi, to find out what scope there was for groups of local people to become involved in the project design (ie. of the pots) I was advised not to 'obsess or 'fixate' about the pots themselves - the point is to draw the viewer's attention to the environment.  So if others are feeling patronised or condescended to, I'm not really surprised. The whole tone of the exercise was very badly judged.Clearly you're all well aware of the lack of sustainability in the project - what condition the planting is likely  to be in in 6 months time.THis seems to be a done deal, unfortunatley. So I think the best that could be done at this stage would be to talk to the person with the budget and commissioning power at the council and ask them whether, given that there is no opportunity in this project for any meaningful community involvement, could part of the overall 500k funding be allocated/diverted to a genuine community project.  Particuarly as expectations about community involvement have been raised, and then disappointed, and particularly given the apparently wasted opportunity for such involvement that this project represents.I would also ask whether in future, publicly funded projects like this could be more widely advertised when put out to tender, and the community involved in a more genuine way from the outset. Other questions to be answered are: who selected the people who drew up the shortlist, who else was on it,and what is the budget? The way this has been handled is extremely bad PR for the council.  For the local community in general, and for its young people and arts practitioners, I would so far as saying that it is a waste of public funds.

Alison Lumb ● 5385d

I am glad someone has raised the issue of how the consultation process was carried out.I also went down to the market a couple of weeks ago to look at the proposals. I loved some of the ideas and filled out postcards with my feedback and put them in the feedback box.While I was there I found myself being very heavily lobbied about the pots project. I was also told that the budget (£500000) wasnt really a lot of money ! If I am honest I thought the pots idea was so ridiculous that I assumed it could never be commissioned.  I walked away, slightly bemused, holding a pot of earth "from Hampstead heath".Imagine my surprise then when only four days later I discover that the decision has been made and the pots project has been commissioned.To me this feels like a a £500,000 heist.Frankly what I would like to know is who made the decision and  was it independent? How many people were consulted, how widely were the projects advertised, and was there enough time given to consider the feedback. (No-one I know seems to know anything about the pots plan.) I also want to know whether people giving feedback on that market stall were being unduly influenced.I wrote to Modus Operandi asking some of this - and have now been directed to the council.Part of me is still astonished at what is happening. The council seem totally unaware that they are facing a PR catastrophe. It just seems indefensible in the middle of a recession to spend half a million quid on an absurd plan to create 21 pots.

Richard Grange ● 5385d

I thought it would be helpful to clarify the situation around this major investment in Acton.The Council wanted to prioritise Acton as an important part of the borough in order to get funding through the Mayor’s Outer London Fund.  We were delighted to have been successful and shown that we were worthy of getting one of the highest allocations of £1/2m to invest into Acton.As people have noted, whilst we only recently got notification, the terms of the funding is that it needs to be spent by March 2012.  Given this tight deadline we’ve been working extremely hard in order to pull together the initial ideas around how it could be spent ahead of a genuine consultation.  The initial posts on this forum listed ideas that run through the core of what we are trying to do with this money for Acton.  Those early ideas were informed following meetings with local councillors, those who attended the three Acton ward forums as well as a very well received presentation at the Churchfield Community Association AGM.  Of course, as part of any consultation, there is an opportunity to take on board feedback, both positive and negative in order to ensure that the money is spent as best as possible and in a way that will really benefit Acton, its residents and shoppers.Key elements of the project, which I have already noted is what people are calling out for (on this Forum and elsewhere) include:·        Tree replacement project in King Street·        Moving or removing the green Market Kiosk (would be replaced with more suitable storage in a more suitable location)·        Improvements in The Mount and space outside St. Mary’s Church·        Business support/start up training and grants·        Funding support for a trader’s group·        Better, more focussed lighting along the High Street which will be more environmentally friendly and a better deterrent for anti-social behaviour·        Better landscaping of the paving allowing better pedestrian access along the High Street as well as allowing the trees to survive and flourish·        This includes decluttering the High Street and where appropriate this will mean removing guard railsThe current plans also seek to develop and deliver:·        More community events·        Improvements to signage and ‘wayfinding’ (as can be found outside Shepherd’s Bush station and is now the standard across London)·        Lighting and public art project for Acton Vale Bridge (only two signs on either side)·        Uplighting of key buildings and an opportunity for public art throughout the area (although this is a small part of as you can see above a far wider list of things that we are hoping to achieve with this project)On the last point we are liaising with local groups such as APPLE and are open to incorporate ideas to ensure that the money goes to what local residents and traders feel with have the biggest return for the investment in improving the experience people have of using the area and who knows, maybe even draw in other people to come and shop in Acton too.  That is why the vast majority of the funding is going on the key elements of the proposals.I’m very positive that with the team that we have, we can work and deliver a project that Actonians can be proud of and that means continuing to be open to ideas and suggestions.  If you have any then please do not hesitate to e-mail Nick O’Donnell on odonnelln@ealing.gov.uk Bassam--- Cllr Bassam MahfouzEaling Cabinet member for Environment & Transport twitter.com/BassamMahfouzwww.bassammahfouz.com

Bassam Mahfouz ● 5383d

Nick O'Donnell - who is in charge of the project - has been in touch to explain why there seems to have been a bit of a hiatus:"As you will have noticed, there still remain a number of project elements to be delivered.  The reason for the delay is that in late February the GLA announced it was going to withdraw £123,000 of our funding on the project.  This meant that I had to put a number of project elements on hold whilst we sought to recover some of these monies.  I'm pleased to say we have fought hard and to date have  recovered most of this money back.  Accordingly we are now pressing on with delivering the final elements of the scheme.  Over the coming months, the following will therefore be delivered: >> 1. Completion of the Corridor 1 works along Acton High Street.  >> 2. Legible London pedestrian wayfinding signs installed at key locations across the town centre.>> 3. A new market kiosk delivered replacing the existing one. Planning approval is expected this week and the order will then be placed.>> 4. St Mary's Church frontage improvements.  Planning application submitted and Church working on finding final funding elements.>> 5. Acton signage and lighting on Acton Vale Bridge.  Network Rail approval now secured and materials on order.>> 6. Public art vessels roll out at approximately half a dozen buildings along the High Street.>> 7. Beechworth House art project.  Agreement completed with owners and materials on order.>> 8. Uplighting enhancement projects secured for Acton High Street, Beechworth House, Acton Vale Bridge, St Mary's Church and The Mount.Not sure if the "corridor 1" works mentioned above are the ones which have sparked some questions on another thread.

Sara Nathan ● 5251d