Forum Topics

Deadline For Comments On Friary Park Redevelopment

Once again www.Acton3W.com demonstrates how pathetic its service is by failing to provide the link necessary, https://pam.ealing.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=PVLSE9JM0GW00&activeTab=summaryTodays post comes 2 weeks after the application was received on 29 Jul 2019, the day after Ealing Council Director of Regeneration and Planning Lucy Taylor acknowledged she was not doing her job because she have attended the MIPIM junket in Cannes. Ms Taylor was informed in May 2019 that the Environmental Impact Assessment on the Friary Park Estate, Acton, London W3 for application No. 191539SCO written by her friend Mary Mescall of Barton Willmore, who also attended MIPIM junket in Cannes, was deliberately misleading and omited crucial information necessary for a planning committee to make an informed decision. Yet the application proceeds.Because of all the time Ms Taylor spent abroad this year she claimed to be unaware the Mayor of London had stated no social housing in London was to be demolished but clearly Julian Bell is willing to break with Sadiq Khan to help his friends at Mount Anvil and Catalyst just as he has done with A2Dominion.Catalyst say that all existing social housing tenants on the estate will be offered a new home in the development which is a blatant lie. Mary Mescall failed to mention the "Friary Park Steering Group" set up and funded by Catalyst, consisting of its employees who held meetings which excluded single parents, the elderly and the disabled. Councillor Abdullah Gulaid attended these meetings, praised Catalyst for providing housing and employment for Black people and has helped them break the law by bypassing the Locata system of social housing allocation. Labour support Mount Anvil and Catalyst Housing Group efforts to force disabled and elderly people out of London through their illegal ‘Residents’ Charter but had Mary Mescall been competent and honest she would have reported that Catalyst have broken social housing allocation law and moved selected tenants into the new Dickens Yard development where they continue to pay social rent of £124 per week.

Martin Cain ● 2600d1 Comments ● 2600d

LBE now legally required to declare CIL monies received.

Expect much squirming at The Ealing Kremlin?NONE too soon of course, this was looooooooong overdue and is bound to be a revealing eye opener, especially regarding all The Towers.https://www.housingtoday.co.uk/news/councils-forced-to-spell-out-details-of-cil-deals/5101382.article?fbclid=IwAR1t9yY-br8cwQ0CkHl491MleyCZuFHix8T514_mgbyYCqxy0zpSTT2y3ME#.XW4pa8L-yp0.facebookCouncils forced to spell out details of CIL dealsBy Hamish Champ2 September 2019Housing minister said residents shouldn’t be left ‘in the dark’ over how much councils receive from developersLocal councils are being forced to publish full details of how much cash they receive from developers to fund local infrastructure work around new housing schemes.Housing minister Esther McVey said reforms to the planning rules governing the community infrastructure levy (CIL) meant residents would know how much money was being spent by their local council on infrastructure such as roads or new schools.The new rules, which came into effect yesterday, meant councils will have to publish details of the deals they had struck with developers “so residents can see exactly how money will be spent investing in the future of their community”, McVey said.And from December next year local authorities will also have to publish an annual report spelling out the all the CIL agreements agreed with developers in the previous 12 months.Many councils already publish details of such funding arrangements, according to the Local Government Association (LGA).McVey said builders “spent a whopping £6bn towards local infrastructure in 2016/17” but councils had not been required to report on the total amount of funding they had received or how it was spent, “leaving residents in the dark”.She went on: “The new rules … will allow residents to know how developers are contributing to the local community when they build new homes, whether that’s contributing to building a brand new school, roads, or a doctor’s surgery that the area needs.”In another move, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has published new planning practice guidance, which the department said “seeks to further simplify advice on the CIL regime, helping communities and developers understand what is required”.The MHCLG said restrictions would also be relaxed around allowing councils the chance to fund single larger infrastructure projects from cash received from multiple schemes.Responding to the government’s announcement on detailing CIL payments, the LGA’s planning spokesman, David Renard, said: “Councils support the principle of infrastructure funding statements showing how much developers’ money is spent on local communities, and many councils already publish them.“This work needs to be fully funded and councils also need sufficient lead-in time.“The government should further reform the CIL in the upcoming Spending Round. This includes removing national exemptions, which reduce the amount of funding to invest in critical infrastructure to facilitate development, and allowing them to be decided by councils at a local level.”SOURCE:   Housing Today.CREDIT:    Libby Kemp for publicising.

Rosco White ● 2610d13 Comments ● 2608d