Forum Topic

Yep, COMPLAIN - LOUD and LONG ................... !It’s VITAL for individuals to get a bit active and let the Authorities know, in no uncertain terms, that the continuing Horn Lane Pollution is completely unacceptable and to demand strong, immediate, remedial action - all Authorities are the same, they just don’t take Pollution seriously until LOADS of people Complain, regularly and relentlessly.When Complaining it is essential to obtain a REFERENCE NUMBER for your Complaint – no Reference Number given, no Complaint will probably be officially lodged/registered, and there is a suspicion that this may be deliberate to keep Complaints numbers down as per their "official records".The Council & Environment Agency websites for Complaining have been given in a previous posting in this thread and the more locals who also join SHLAP (Stop Horn Lane Pollution) the better. It costs nothing to be in SHLAP and there are a number of SHLAP Members diligently beavering away in the background regarding the Horn Lane Pollution issues.You need to open a Yahoo account if you don’t have one already and can join SHLAP at:-http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StopHornLanePollution/Once joined, cajole your neighbours to join and then in turn those neighbours should cajole their neighbours to join and so on, thus providing SHLAP with more “clout” to ensure eradication of this Pollution menace once and for all.Those who have additional time and inclination might like to email/write to Planning Policy, Ealing Council, regarding the Public Consultation on the LB Ealing’s Local Plan (or Local Development Framework), pointing out that it is unacceptable for this Industrial Estate to continue polluting and that the entire Estate needs to be transformed into something pleasant & non-polluting, as befits a “flagship” CrossRail Station, the last one before Central London.Complaints could also be lodged with Angie Bray, our local MP.(PS - I'm aware you have joind SHLAP Angela!)

Rosco White ● 5081d

Patricia Walker, Cllr, replied that she had contacted Ealing Council who would be emailing me, which they did.  I also contacted Angie Bray, who was very helpful and seems to be on the case but still nothing is being done.Here is the reply from Ealing Council, which confuses me due to the inaction that is clearly going on.  Is there a problem or isn't there?  Clearly there is, as Angie Bray agrees.  Thank-you for your e-mail about air pollution in Horn Lane, which has been forwarded to me by Cllr Dr Patricia Walker. The Council has been monitoring pollution in Horn Lane since 2005.  At that time there was a very severe problem with dust associated with some of the Acton Goods Yard industrial activities.  Through a combination of enforcement action taken by the Council and by the Environment Agency (EA) there has been a substantial reduction in the amount of dust pollution being caused by these operations.  (Some background information is provided in the Briefing Note attached, prepared for the East Acton Ward Forum in June this year.)  At present there remain dust control issues with some of the companies involved and the Council and the EA are continuing to work with them to make the further improvements that are needed. The air pollution levels that I believe have caused you alarm recently have been the predicted fine particle (PM10) Daily Air Quality Index levels as they are provided on the EalingAir and London Air Quality Network websites.  The video below describes the purpose of these new daily indices, that were introduced by Defra at the beginning of 2012. http://www.londonair.org.uk/LondonAir/Guide/Soundslides/DailyAirQualityIndex/DailyAirQualityIndexVideo.aspx These predictions work well in most instances, but where the monitoring station is located close to an industrial site the predictions are less reliable and there is a tendency for the forecast level to over-predict the pollutant level that will prevail during the course of the day.  The actual level for a given 24-hour period is available on the website on the next day when the daily average for the previous 24 hours can be calculated.  Kings College London, who host the EalingAir and London Air Quality Network websites, gave the following information on this problem earlier in the year:-“Having looked at the predictive performance of the DAQI ‘triggers’ since the start of the year it is apparent that the erratic nature of local sources at industrial sites, including near waste transfer stations, is at times causing an over prediction of daily levels. This issue with erratic sources was identified during the original work by King’s for COMEAP, and the industrial sites were excluded from the original 270,000 site days used to calculate the PM10 triggers. Work is ongoing to identify an enhanced reporting method to reflect the site specific PM10 at these sites.”Because of the unpredictable nature of industrial emissions as compared, for example, with road traffic emissions, the forecast daily air quality index you will find for PM10 at the Horn Lane monitoring station is, on occasions, rather higher than it ought to be and we can find that ‘High’ readings are predicted that do not in fact materialise.  Having said this, my colleagues and I are very well aware that levels are indeed still too high and that there needs to be an on-going effort to secure further improvements. I trust that the above information goes some way towards responding to your concerns, but you are welcome to contact me directly on the number below if you wish to discuss any matter further. Yours sincerely, John Freeman Dr John FreemanTeam Leader, Pollution Technical Team Regulatory ServicesLondon Borough of Ealing

Angela White ● 5080d

It's a white wash.If the highest level is recorded, how can it be predicted? Are the council saying that the results are inaccurate at the recording station?  How is it that traffic pollutants such as exhaust fumes seem to be a main cause?  Hanger Lane records a level 2 with the high volume of traffic, while Horn Lane records a level 7 even when the traffic flow is moderate.  Something stinks and, it's about time the council put their hands up and admitted their failures to the residents.Will Ealing council continue to sweep this issue under the carpet, in the hope that it goes away, or will they get off their fat backsides and do something constructive, like get it sorted?  I think we know the answer, so we will continue to suffer and, develop respiratory diseases far into the future.I accuse Ealing council of enforced euthanasia, by way of failure to deal with the situation and subjecting people to premature death due to high levels of pollution. (I don't care if that's hard and the council don't like it.)  It has been reported in the past that Horn Lane is one of the most polluted roads in the country.  A council official told me that the problem is only from Acton Main Line to the A40.  It was denied that the wind/breeze does not spread the PM 10s to and around surrounding roads.I had a chat with a doctor a couple of months ago, who confirmed that PM 10 pollutants are hazardous to those with respiratory disease and, can also be a serious cause of causing respiratory problems in the future.  The irritation caused can also cause the vomiting of blood. That is frightening, as the first thing you think of, is, cancer.Terrified.

Nicola Howard ● 5080d

A white wash indeed. Bring back Vlod please.  The Council's Environmental Health Director should be asked to attend all the local Forum meetings to explain what is and what is not happening.PM10's are very small, when breathed into the lungs they cannot cope with them as they are so small .... result???  Check out the web, not nice.The monitoring station is to the north of the site.  Suggestion.One monitoring site to be placed at the junction further north to measure vehicle pollution.  The other actually inside the problem site in order to measure what pollutants they are releasing.This is something all the local residents associations need to have a JOINT view on.  With all the ideas floating around about development of Acton Main Line Station/cross rail, and the need for them to be environmentally friendly, this could be the time to rid us of these 'industrial' sites which really should not be at this location blowing all their pollutants locally and down to Poets Corner. (smell the biscuits)Councillor Abdullah Gulaid is one of the Acton Central Councillors.  He lives in St. Dunstans Avenue I believe, so he too may be effected by the pollution blowing over his home and family.  Please note he is Chairman of the Health and Adult Social Services Standing Scrutiny Panel - can I suggest that adds this problem to his next agenda?Ward: Acton CentralParty: LabourEmail: abdullah.gulaid@ealing.gov.ukTel: (020) 8825 5173All complaints to be copied into him please.c/o Labour Group Members' Room, Ealing Town Hall, New Broadway, London, W5 2BY Surgery:1st Sunday of every month: New surgery details will be forthcoming. In the meantime, contact Cllr Daniel Crawford on 020 8992 9353 or by email daniel.crawford@ealing.gov.uk; 2nd Saturday of the month, 11am-12noon, Friary Park Community Centre, Joseph Avenue, Acton, W3 6NL (except August); 1st Saturday of the month, 11am-12noon, Acton Village Gardening Association, The Pavillion, Alwyn Gardens, London, W3 (except August). The Acton Labour Councillors will take turns to attend a surgery every Saturday, 11am–12noon, Ruskin Hall, 16 Church Road, Acton, W3. Cabinet: N/ACommittee membership:Overview and Scrutiny Committee; Health and Adult Social Services Standing Scrutiny Panel (Chair); Planning Committee; Corporate Parent Committee; Fostering Panel; Mental Health Champions.Outside Bodies: Acton (Middlesex) Charities; Action Acton Limited; Ealing Racial Equality Council; Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee for North West London; Pocklington Apprenticeship Trust.

Dee Cook ● 5080d

From Angie Bray's speech/debatewww.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2010-12-15a.291.0 -That ease of access makes it obvious why Horn lane was chosen to house an industrial site in the first place. It has first-rate rail links and is right on the doorstep of the Park Royal estate. The A40 is to the north and the Uxbridge road is to the south. That made sense in the past, when Horn lane was home to factories, rather than flats and houses as it is now. It must seem odd to those who work on the site that they drive their lorries, unload their skips and transfer their waste right in the heart of a residential community. To local residents, it is ridiculous that their quality of life is being impaired by that throwback, which produces literally sky-high levels of pollution.Incidentally, although we are looking at air pollution today, the noise pollution from some of those units is also intolerable. The beeping of lorries backing up to empty their loads, the clanking of skips being unloaded and reloaded, and the general din of deafening noise produced by large vehicles moving back and forth in a confined space is also pretty awful for residents. There is no doubt that a more modern and enclosed site would limit both air and noise pollution and increase efficiency. Those units are way behind their times, another reason why they are so unsuitable for the area they remain in.However, it is the high levels of small, carcinogenic PMIO particles that produce the really serious health problems. They are produced when the units transfer aggregates and building materials from rail to road and engage in their waste-transfer activities. PMIO particles are proven to have a range of effects on health, including effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, asthma and mortality. As the evidence that I will share shows, PMIO levels originating from the Horn lane site have consistently overshot the maximum permitted from any one location. That that is allowed to continue in a heavily populated residential area is just not on.Monitoring of pollution levels at the Horn lane site is already in place. The Environment Agency is now comparing readings from all three of the monitoring devices at the site in the hope that the sources of the PMIO can be more precisely located. However, residents who complain about the unacceptably high levels of pollution have for years heard the familiar refrain from the Environment Agency that it is monitoring pollution from the site and will take action if the industrial units exceed the limits agreed under their operating licenses. Indeed the monitoring equipment takes readings every 15 minutes, which allows pollution patterns to be identified. The readings show that both measures for pollution levels-the daily and annual average readings-far exceed the maximum levels permitted.

Nicola Howard ● 5075d

Roll on Wednesday.Air pollution banding Value Accompanying health messages for at-risk groups and the general populationAt-risk individuals * General populationLow 1-3 Enjoy your usual outdoor activities. Enjoy your usual outdoor activities.Moderate 4-6 Adults and children with lung problems, and adults with heart problems, who experience symptoms, should consider reducing strenuous physical activity, particularly outdoors. Enjoy your usual outdoor activities.High 7-9 Adults and children with lung problems, and adults with heart problems, should reduce strenuous physical exertion, particularly outdoors, and particularly if they experience symptoms. People with asthma may find they need to use their reliever inhaler more often. Older people should also reduce physical exertion. Anyone experiencing discomfort such as sore eyes, cough or sore throat should consider reducing activity, particularly outdoors.Very High 10 Adults and children with lung problems, adults with heart problems, and older people, should avoid strenuous physical activity. People with asthma may find they need to use their reliever inhaler more often. Reduce physical exertion, particularly outdoors, especially if you experience symptoms such as cough or sore throat.* Adults and children with heart or lung problems are at greater risk of symptoms. Follow your doctor's usual advice about exercising and managing your condition. It is possible that very sensitive individuals may experience health effects even on Low air pollution days.

Nicola Howard ● 5049d