Forum Topic

I have sent the following email to numerous Councillors, Head of the Council, interested parties and the Head of Environment:Dear Robin and Councillors,For weeks now I have been reporting that my street and those around it have had the litter pick/street cleaner arrive before the collections have happened.  Each week we've been left with debris still on our pavements, gutters and roads and as I cannot bear that, I go and clean it myself.  Again, last Thursday, it happened once more.  My 4 year old daughter and I went and cleaned it yesterday (she has her own litter pick from M&S) and came back 50 mins later with 2 big bag fulls.  Below, is a reply from you Robin, which, rather than placate me, does rather the opposite.  Are you saying that Enterprise cannot cope with leaves falling in Ealing?  Are we to expect the same for snow?  Simply put:  Acton's streets (not just mine) look more unkept than I can remember in many years.  I have noticed a vast decline in the cleanliness of our streets and I can only assume it's Enterprise with their street cleaners arriving before the collations take place and their now stated inability to cope with autumn.To my mind we now have a crisis.  I, along with many others in our area, worked tirelessly with the previous governing Council to get our streets to a state where they were clean and free from litter most days of the week.  Everyone was happy.  What we have now is the broken windows effect….people see the streets not be cared for so don't think twice about chucking another piece of litter to the mounting piles.It's an absolute disgrace.  I will not leave it there.  I cannot see my own time and effort be trashed like this.  Many of us worked hard to get the "Filthy Acton" status changed in Acton (do you remember the Filthy Acton thread on ActonW3.com?)  And now we're back to Filthy Acton, I'm sorry to say. I look forward to a more acceptable reply, outlying a workable plan with Enterprise.  Quote from Einstein:  The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the same results.

Angela White ● 5049d

I was surprised to hear that a phone call to customer services about a service failure was, at the SPECIFIC request of the caller, also treated as a formal complaint. She tells me she got a letter in writing which is what happens under the complaints procedures. So a phone call worked.However I would always write or email the manager (but never to Customer Services) and on each, and every communication include the heading 'Fornal complaint'.As previously advised on these websites there are 3 levels of complaint before you will be entertained by the Ombudsman. That is why it behoves you to put every single little detail down in the first approach, so that you don't have to (most boringly) keep adding stuff as the correspondence proceeds. It then is miles easier at each step to say nothing more than, sorry not good enough, next complaint level up please.I have just seen the latest post.The consequence is never use the customer services email function (if it works). Just phone them and say also it is a complaint, OR go straight to the complaints page which in one shape or annother has always been there.http://www.ealing.gov.uk/info/100004/council_and_democracy/516/complaints/2In these forms there IS space to describe the complaint. In the forms mentioned by Nicola there is no space and so they will never fall into the complaints stats.Then choose the form which best suits your issue.All this falls into that ancient category -'if a job's worth doing, etc etc.'.If you need more commentary then fine, but I am dying for a late banana and custard please. And if that's not enough a slice of royal bread piled high with marmelade!

George Knox ● 5048d

As a Streetwatcher, I reported the lack of proper street cleaning in my street and the neighbouring ones. I asked for this to be referred to Robin Williamson, and have had it registered as a complaint - with a reference number.As Bob says, the rubbish/recycling collections are never at the same time each week. For many weeks, plastic was collected early and the rest of the recycling collected at around 2pm, this week they were collecting the plastic at 3pm, and the rest had been collected earlier. I do not know when or if we had any street cleaners, but I do know that Cumberland Road had a lot of spilt plastics littering it. Why can the recycling team not pick up the bits they drop?I have complained about the rubbish in the little gardens in Horn lane near The Mermaid carwash - they are apparently 'parks department', but they still have not been cleared of the cans/bottles etc a week on - so another request via Streetwatchers...And as for the number of cigarette ends that the street cleaner in Horn Lane has ignored this morning....Once upon a time the street cleaners used a nice, big broom to get all the litter, now they use a litter-picker and very occasionally their very ineffectual broom so all the cigarette ends get left. I walked past where he had just cleaned, and there was still litter there, too small for his litter-picker to grab I expect.Let's hope someone, somewhere sees sense and we do not have to put up with this shoddy service for another 14 and a half years! Does anyone know if other areas of the Borough are suffering in the same way?

Amanda Knights ● 5045d

Michael Hynes, founding MD of Enterprise saidhttp://www.enterprise.plc.uk/_common/download/brochures/ThePartyConferenceMagazineFinal_Sept2011.pdf"We are not a traditional contractor. We believe in payment by results and willingly place our reward at risk against the quality of our service performance."REALLY?on 16 Novemeber Colm Costello reports on his blog about a question to Overview and Scrutiny Committee"Has the Council imposed any penalties on the contractor for not meeting the specifications in the contract and was told they had, but wasn't told how much."Ealing Council Latest propaganda, whoops I meant News reports"Martin Joyce, Managing Director for Enterprise said:“We are delighted that we'll be working in partnership with Ealing Council. We're very confident that we can help deliver better environmental services at the same time as demonstrating value for money to Ealing's residents."http://www.ealing.gov.uk/news/article/266/environmental_services_contract_signedDon't think he still is MD of this division. The following Report refers to a massive clearout of senior staff.Enterprise's Annual Report and Accounts 2011 page 26 says:-"Environmental services contract with Ealing Borough Council, worth £80m over five years. The contract will be mobilised in two phases: grounds in January 2012 and the remaining services in April 2012."http://www.enterprise.plc.uk/_common/download/brochures/Final_SinglePage.pdfERR, FIVE YEARS? IS THAT CORRECT?If you read all the whole of the above Ealing Council link you will see the contract is for 15 years with a seven year break. You could email the Cabinet member bassam.mahfouz@ealing.gov.ukand ask about the discrepancy and get him to confirm that he really tied us in for 15 years, or you could emailstuart.chaston@enterprise.plc.ukwho now appears to be the MD for Government Services and tell him what you think about your local services, and at the same time ask him to get advice from his auditors (Deloittes) as to whether investors in Enterprise PLC would be interested in knowing that there is a 15 year rather than just a 5 year commitment. I found a reference about a possible change of ownership of Enterprise, but I really cannot verify that. However the Accounts do need to be accurate - DON'T THEY?

George Knox ● 5038d

Very interesting background, George. Thank you. Any idea if an FOI request to the Council to publish the actual contract with Enterprise would succeed? Or could they weasel out of it on commercially confidential grounds?Based on the below extract from your link to the Council's own website, Bassam Mahfouz should lose his job at the very least. Naive muppet. "Other parts of the contract will come into force next April [2012] and will include improvements in the quality of street cleaning, with more sweeping taking place.Streets will also be cleaned the same day as refuse and recycling collection, but after the collection has taken place so any spilt waste will be dealt with immediately – currently they are cleaned the day after collection. Waste and recycling will continue to be collected weekly from households and bins in parks will be emptied more frequently. Garden waste will be collected every two weeks from households that wish to subscribe.Councillor Bassam Mahfouz, cabinet member for Transport and Environment, said: “This is one of Ealing’s most important contracts so we wanted to ask companies to provide more for less, given the current climate. What we have will ensure delivering the absolute best for our residents, while also getting the best value possible. With this new contract we will make significant savings and improve the services delivered to the borough. It is anticipated the new contract will save the council and the taxpayer at least £3million annually. I look forward to working with Enterprise in our campaign to become one of the greenest and cleanest boroughs in London.”

Peter Millman ● 5037d

Thanks.I cannot think for a moment that any government agency would publish the whole of a contract. That would be too much of an intrusion into commercial competition. But if you pushed hard enough it might/should be possible to get some of the key conditions which you might expect in any similar contract.Who should lose their job is moot and has been extensively discussed on these websites. Bassam is not a cleaning manager. He has or does work for a Housing Assoc. I do suspect that the process or quite some part of preparing for a new contract is left to the so called experts in the cleaning department and then the key factors are put to Bassam to sign off. He might have asked for some changes, but it would have been down to the Officers to ensure that such changes were in the contract and importantly it would have been up to them to ensure that such conditions would work. A leader has to trust his staff and if they have been in post for a long time (which apparently they had) then to whatever degree you have to trust your very highly paid staff. But the position of a Cabinet member is that the buck stops at his/her door.History shows that that there are always a few very high up people who are not suitable for the job even though they have been in post for ever and ever. If you believe Government employers, their high ups are ever so difficult to get rid of – far worse than if working at the top of major commercial organisations. Conditions have changed so radically in the employment market that entitlement to the wondrous terms government employees enjoy must be eliminated. They don’t get it do they?Naturally I cannot prove it, but I would put more blame at the door of the experts and that is where brown envelopes should be issued. This problem is not going to go away until drastic action is taken.In the meantime keep lodging formal complaints and copy in both Bassam and the Enterprise MD (see previous post).

George Knox ● 5037d

Figures released on Thursday night (question 32) show that 20% of Ealing’s streets were unacceptably dirty in November.  Eight months into the new Enterprise contract Ealing council has still not managed to give residents the service that they pay for.  This new contract is actually meant to be better than the old one.  The previous contract with May Gurney demanded that at least 90% of Ealing’s streets were graded A in the nationally agreed measurement scheme for these things.  As you can see last year May Gurney typically exceeded this.  The new contract says at least 95% of Ealing’s streets should be cleaned to grade A standard.  Again the figures show the nearest that Enterprise has got to this was August and September when 12.9% of streets were graded A.  In October and November these numbers were 16.2% and 19.5% respectively.  Of course it is harder to keep the streets clean in the autumn but Enterprise has been 2.5 times worse than May Gurney was the year before.  May Gurney consistently met its 90% target last year.  Enterprise hasn’t got anywhere near its contracted target.  Back in November Enterprise came to the Overview and Scrutiny meeting for a grilling.  You wouldn’t know it from the minutes but three different Tory councillors asked essentially the same question.  When will Enterprise meet its 95% grade A target?  Three times the question was ignored by council leader Cllr Julian Bell and the man in charge of this nonsense Cllr Bassam Mahfouz.  Neither the Labour administration nor Enterprise has made any undertaking as to when Ealing residents will get the service they pay for. 

Phil Taylor ● 5014d

Bob,I don't think that it is that simple.  A saving has been taken out but there probably always was a saving to be made.  The new contract includes ground maintenance for both parks and the council housing estate so there were some economies of scale to be achieved.  The old ECT contract was made in relatively good times and you always have to question how keen the price was when the chief exec of ECT was a labour councillor and protfolio holder.  He didn't get directly involved in the decision making but you do have to wonder.  The Conservative administration bolted on some additions to the contract as it was not sensible to just end it.  There was big scope to get a better price and not see the service diminished.  Indeed nowhere in the procurement process was there any admission by either the council or the contractor that there would be a worse service as a result.  In my view the driver for the poor performance was the "big bang" approach to the new contract. On day one everything changed.  New vehicles, new rounds and new processes.  The promise to street clean the same day as collections always looked over-ambitious and has caused them to change the Ts and Cs of the street cleaners so they start later.  This only happened months in.  On top of that they failed to get new and rather revolutionary recycling collection vehicles delivered until the end of July.  As a result the workforce has had to change rounds again and again.  The big worry for the Tory group is that Enterprise are putting enough manpower in (certainly more than they envisaged) and, unfortunately, they are still not succeeding and they will end up with an unsustainable business which gives Ealing residents problems for years to come.

Phil Taylor ● 5014d

The last two month’s street cleaning figures have been dire to say the least.  The proportion of streets cleaned right first time fell to 65% in May according to the answer to a written question (number 39) asked by me at the last council meeting. For the last year (2011/12) of the old May Gurney service the contractor very consistently managed to get 88% properly clean first time.  The Enterprise contract requires that a level of 95% is achieved.  Last year on average Enterprise was appalling, only managing to get 70% of streets right first time over the course of the year.  In April only 76% of streets were right first time.  In May this number fell to 65%.  So over 1/3rd of all the Borough’s streets were unacceptably dirty after the first clean in May.  The council inspected 28% of streets in April and 22% in May and sent the contractor back to clean them.  Of these reinspected streets 95% in April and 86% in May finally made the grade.  Astoundingly in May 14% of the streets inspected (only one in 5) were still unacceptably dirty after 2 cleans.  The original concept of the contract was that 95% of streets should be Grade A clean first time.  How far we are from that vision.  The only way the council will solve this is to increase the number of inspections it does.  Right now it is cheaper for the contractor to go back to a few streets and re-clean them than it is for them to get it right first time across the Borough.  Only when the level of inspections increases will the contractor be forced to get it right first time.  Cutting the inspections was a mistake.  Jason Stacey’s Conservatives in 2006 proved that the only way to clean up Ealing is to focus on it and