Forum Topic

Apols Keith if that is how you felt. I don't what you know and what you don't - and likewise. The difference is that I was very aware of politics and history when the referendum was held. That made me much closer to the feeling on the street and in the media. I suggest that you understand the mood but as historical fact. It was a mucch more difficult decision than the AV vote we had recently.I should have clarified that I do not support the present arrangements. I don't know about leaving altogether because I just cannot understand the arguments well enough. Frankly I wonder if anyone does. The safer option would probably be to withdraw in steps.I support the principle of Human Rights but part needs to be adjusted so we don't get such silly outcomes and I certainly don't accept that cases should be allowed to drag out year after year. I don't support the present immigration laws which need some radical overhaul. I don't support Strasbourg having any rights over our sovereign law.  There should be some kind of law which compels us to be more responsible. That would have to reviewed over say 15 year periods to keep abreast of changing values. I don't support the benefits entitlements as they are now as regards people who do not have a British passport.And no I don't support us now having to contribute to yet another country with such debt problems.Apart from some businessmen and the fear of the unknown of probably all national governments I would find it very difficult to believe that many people in this country support staying in.But the issue is now becoming more frenetic because the Liberal party has lost it and the void is being filled by UKIP.

George Knox ● 5020d

We made plenty of mistakes in the '70s but one of the biggest was that we spent far more time looking back to the '40s than forward to the 2000s.  And faced with the perception of a renewed threat from Germany, going into a united Europe appears to have been a stunningly attractive option at the time.  But, as so often in the '70s, the longer-term implications were brushed aside.  We are now reaping what we sowed.I speak 4 European languages ; French, German, Italian and my native English, yet I would happily stand as a UKIP candidate tomorrow if I were younger and had more time and energy.  I recently read an article (in Italian!) about Mario Draghi, president of the European Central Bank.  He claims that the Eurozone could be saved if people would take Norman Tebbit's "on your bike" philosophy a stage further and seek work across this fantasmagorical single labour market that he sees the now almost 30-state EU as being. There is nothing like a 30-nation single market, comprising different states, with different languages and economies in a variety of conditions (many utter basket cases), to generate truly mass unemployment from Dublin to Athens.  Even if the language barriers could be overcome (which they never will be), all the movement would be one-way, to the countries with the lowest unemployment rates, probably Germany and France.  And in no time, guess what, their unemployment rates would go shooting up.  Where are the new unemployed French and Germans supposed to go? Greece? Croatia?In the same Italian magazine I read an article about the economy of just about the only European country that's not in the EU ; Switzerland.  Quite simply, they are one of the most competitive in the world.  Not immune from recession, certainly, but far from being in crisis like Greece, Italy or the UK.  But then they can slam their doors on all these Tebbit "bikers" riding in from Greece, Croatia and the like.  Their single labour market is..well, Switzerland.  And they have their own currency and contribute nothing towards Eurozone bailouts or the expenses of MEPs.

David Lawes ● 5020d