Forum Topic

The Industrial Site Meeting.

Some positive results...To deal with overweight vehicles using the bridge.  It was suggested to John Freeman, that a CCTV camera be installed to catch the perpetrators.  The issue was also raised by a resident from Emmanuel Ave. A number of issues were raised with the Environment Agency, Hanson's, Gowing & Pursey, Yeoman Aggregates and Ealing Council and Crossrail. it was pointed out that the overnight noise from Crossrail, could be heard as far as Bollo Ln. (Chiswick end.) We all need our sleep. As to the retrospective planning application By Hanson's, there should be a decision at the end of next week. There seem to be a lot of problems over Hanson's,  Angie Bray raised several issues, the main one being that the conveyor belt should be completely covered. The matter is now in the hands of planning.  Also the noise levels of the conveyor belt were raised.  Hanson's claim working extended hours on Saturday and Sunday was due to Crossrail.  Crossrail claim there is no need to resource from Hanson's.It transpired that G&P had applied for a closed shed, but was rejected by the Council, as the application was not filled in properly.  G&P said they want a closed shed.  Angie asked how long it took to clean the site and, she commented that, she would have preferred to see the site in working condition. No vehicles were on site today.Angie commented that she had been sent a video clip of the dust cloud that emanated from Yeoman (they are now called something else)  Management said that the aggregate is dampened down, but, to much water would stop the aggregate being unloaded, as it would clog up.A number of issues are now in the hands of Ealing Council and the EA.  It was asked what our Councillors are doing, the answer was NOTHING.  They behave like Ostriches.It was suggested that SHLAP and site operators get together every TWO MONTHS, for discussion over issues with the site and residents concerns.  It was accepted that the pollution was still above acceptable limits.  It was pointed out that Hanson's and Yeoman pollution blows over G&P and is recorded as G&P being the main perpetrators as they are closest to the monitor.John Freeman, e-mail:freemanj@ealing.gov.uk  Tel: 020 8825 7226. needs immediate notification of any breeches caused by the site.

Nikki Howard ● 4813d14 Comments

Minutes from Horn Lane Site VisitThe site visit to Horn Lane took place on Friday 12 July at 3.30pm with local residents, Angie Bray MP, Environment Agency representatives, Ealing Council planning and Environmental officers, representatives from Hanson, Aggregate Industries and other local stakeholders, to discuss how pollution levels were affecting local residents. At the first company visit to Gowing and Pursey, questions were raised as to whether a fully enclosed yard would be of more benefit to local residents. Gowing and Pursey claim they submitted an application years ago, but it was rejected by the council. However, the Ealing Council have said that the application was never fully completed, thereby not allowing Ealing's planning department to make a final judgement. Further information is needed, but questions have been raised as to whether we should return to this as an interim solution. The site had been cleaned up prior to the visit and Angie Bray was invited back to see the site under normal working conditions provided she gave Gowing and Pursey half an hour's notice to allow the manager to be in attendance. A number of residents complained of breathing problems and their houses and cars continually being covered with a layer of thick dust. In general the air quality around the wider industrial site felt very much worse than other parts of Acton and got noticeably more so the longer one spent there. It was clear that a person with any kind of respiratory problem such as asthma or allergies would have an incredibly difficult time living near the site. In general, the air quality appeared to be extremely poor and perhaps greater co-operation from the three companies when working with local residents could greatly improve the quality of life on Horn Lane for all concerned. Examples of possible measures to help improve relations include completely enclosing the conveyer belt that offloads waste materials at Hanson’s and that Gowing and Pursey begin a dialogue with residents and the council about enclosing the area where waste is handled. If residents support this option perhaps a planning application could be resubmitted. Finally, Aggregate has agreed to look at the feasibility of installing an extra curtain for unloading from freight, acting as an additional suppressor for dust when unloading. Residents have been complaining about the late hours of operation. Although the point was raised that Hanson’s do have permission to operate at any time under the Crossrail Act, it was suggested that community relations would benefit if greater sensitivity were shown to the interests of the residents. Additionally, it was suggested that when Hanson’s is working late it could inform residents they are doing so. And if it is an issue of meeting the demands of Crossrail or TFL, perhaps an alternative processing location can be found for waste that is collected outside of working business hours. This may be a point that needs to be raised with the Mayor's office or whoever is overseeing night construction for TFL. Furthermore, the issue was raised that since it is an industrial site situated extremely close to what is now a very large residential population, greater tact and understanding seems to be required on the part of the businesses involved. It was also worth noting that although the presence of an industry site had been approved decades earlier, that does not mean that changes since then in the expectations, legal and social rights of residents and indeed in the size of the nearby population of residents could simply be disregarded. Working to reduce pollution levels would hopefully greatly improve relations with local residents and public relations for the three companies involved. However, there have been suggested that perhaps the ideal long term solution would be to re-zone the site. During the site visit the following Action Points were agreed:1. John Freeman from Ealing Council (environment) will check whether there is a requirement for Hanson to cover their conveyer belt to reduce noise.2. Aggregate has agreed to facilitate on-site discussions with other operators and various local stakeholders in their offices and will look to host the first meeting sometime in September.3. Aggregate will also work at increasing information flow to residents and responding to their concerns in a more participatory and engaging manner.4. Aggregate/British Rail will also look into residents complaints regarding dust clouds being raised when unloading materials and the feasibility of installing an additional curtain to help minimize the high volumes of dust being released.5. The retrospective planning application for Hanson is due to be submitted by the end of this week.6. Ealing Council officers in planning or environment will examine why the original planning application for Gowing and Pursey was withdrawn. Why did the company not follow through with its planning application to fully enclose the area where waste is being handled and transported, thereby minimizing the dust and atmospheric pollution for Horn Lane residents?7. The companies will hold meetings every other month with local residents and the Environment Agency to improve communications.

Nikki Howard ● 4807d

From Angie Brays News Letter. Angie attended a meeting of industrial operators and all the major agencies involved in monitoring pollution at the Horn Lane site. Also there was a representative from local residents' group, SHLAP.The meeting was called following the speech Angie made in the House of Commons drawing ministerial attention to the ongoing air pollution problems which sometimes make Horn lane the most polluted road in London.Angie said, "Today's meeting has been a useful exercise.  We've got everyone together on the site.  This isn't before time and for too long residents have been left in the dark.  We've secured some important changes.  Most importantly, the operators have agreed to facilitate regular meetings on site, with the Environment Agency also attending.  Aggregates will look at installing an extra curtain around the freight carriages to suppress dust when aggregates are being unloaded and I have been invited back at any time to the site without notice.  Obviously, the best solution would be to rezone the site, but in the meantime we need to fight for better implementation of the regulations and limitations on activity there.  It may well be that Crossrail is driving certain extra activity, but this should not prevent proper discussion with residents about how this takes place. I've also asked for reports back on other particular queries, which need resolving."The meeting was a start, but there is much more left to do. Clearly this problem isn't going away any time soon, but we have put the companies on notice that we're all watching their activity very closely now. I'm going to stay very close to this issue."

Nikki Howard ● 4803d

From the Ealing Gazette web siteRelief for Horn Lane residents as firms pledge to cut pollutionJul 24 2013 By Michael RussellMP Angie Bray visits Horn Lane industrial estate. PIC CREDIT: NIKKI HOWARDHorn Lane is one of the most polluted roads in London. In June it was the first area in the capital to breach clean air targets according to King's College London.But after eight years of monitoring by the council and the Environment Agency little action has been taken to control the dust which residents say cause chronic health problems.On July 12 the Environment Agency organised a visit by them, the council, MP Angie Bray and Nikki Howard, a member of residents group Stop Horn Lane Pollution. It was prompted by Ms Bray raising the issue in parliament the month before.All firms on the site agreed to regular meetings with the Environment Agency and residents.Waste management plant Gowing and Pursey see whether they can fully enclose their yard.A rail terminal for building materials called Aggregate said they would look at installing a large rubberised curtain around their work area to cut down dust.While Hanson is submitting a retrospective planning application after redeveloping its concrete plant in 2011.Although residents say they are not hopeful that even these measures will be implemented, especially as Hanson has already missed Friday's deadline to submit the application. A spokesman for the company could not explain the missed deadline but said the new plant was not much bigger and was less polluting, although residents say this is not the case.Stop Horn Lane Pollution member Nikki Howard, said: “The measures should have an effect but will it be implemented? We’re dealing with the council and the environment agency and we know what track record they’ve got. Monitoring has been going on for eight years and pollution is just as high.”Ms Bray said the area should be used for something else which could benefit residents and take advantage of Crossrail coming to Acton mainline next door.She said: "These interim measures will help but they’re not the solution. I think the whole area needs to be re-zoned."

Nikki Howard ● 4801d