Forum Topics

Not well enough to attend ward forum.  Could someone deal with the following?

The only ward councillor who appears to be active on the pollution issue is Abdullah.We have to keep the pressure on and make sure the residents get what is their right for cleaner air and less noise.I hope to visit the Japanese Nursery School which is an ethical issue.Has Abdullah done this?  If so could we have some feed back!As we know, the Crawfords are not interested in the pollution issue and Kate is on record as saying:If we did not pass the retrospective planning application, the Planning Inspector would have do so on appeal.How does she know this?  Explanation required!Hansons say they have difficulties in implementing the conditions in the planning approval.They cannot enclose the conveyor belt transporting the aggregate and the tree screening, just to mention two points. (a) the dust is still allowed to pollute the area and (b) they are unable to contain the noise nuisance emitting from the conveyor belt.These two factors should be reason to retract the planning application.After nine years of monitoring, the EA cannot define who the polluters are. G&P Hansons or others.  I understand that G&P have moved, yet the pollution levels remain high.  Aggregates have put measures in place to contain dust, while Hansons have done nothing to reduce PM 10 emissions.  Who's the culprit?  If we can work it out, how come the EA are baffled!What do the councillors from Acton central and east Acton intend doing about the pollution issue that blights our lives and health.  We have the same bunch we had four years ago, and nothing was done, what do they intend to do now?  Our councillors need to push home the pollution issue.  If they are not prepared to tackle this issue, WHY NOT?Could Ealing council carry out more spot checks on the Industrial site.  Could they explain why, when there are high levels of pollution, the site does not shut down, until the levels drop down to a safe level.  Is this about money that the operators do not shut down, or a breach of conditions?  Why do Ealing council refuse to implement the rules and regulations and impose fines on perpetrators?I'm sure there are other questions that require answers, and pressure needs to be put on our less than active councillors.  Could someone put the feed back on the forum.Apologies for my absence, but my health comes first. 

Nikki Howard ● 4458d4 Comments ● 4456d

Horn Lane Pollution monitoring station is affiliated to Defra AURN :-

So, the "monitoring" continues apace and more money spent to prove there's a problem, which has already been proven for the past 9 years.Now, when will The Authorities actually DO something and STOP the pollution?=====================================================================The monitoring station at Horn Lane in Acton has recently been upgraded to include an FDMS PM10 instrument, funded and operated by Defra as part of the AURN.The small monitoring cabinet has been replaced by a larger walk-in cabin to accommodate the additional instrument. This will report reference equivalent PM10 measurements to the European Commission and has been added to the network following Defra’s regular 5 year review of measurements on the national network.John Freeman, Team Leader of the Pollution Technical Team at Ealing Council, said, "We welcome the addition of new measurement instrumentation and the inclusion of the site on the AURN. This will help the council - and other organisations - to continue.The FDMS replaces the TEOM as the particulate measurement source for the Horn Lane dataset and can be found from here. The TEOM PM10 instrument will remain on site to provide continuity of measurements but data will now be found under its own site name of Horn Lane TEOM, including historical statistics from here.Item date 18/06/2014  - http://www.londonair.org.uk/london/asp/news.asp?newsId=HronLane3062014

Rosco White ● 4470d6 Comments ● 4458d