Forum Topics

Homebase: application to raise height another 3 floors - Objections needed

A second objection is required to halt the increase in height at Acton Homebase.And this one we have a good chance of winning or at least achieving the objective – to ensure developers meet the targets set for social housing.  Ealing has 11,500 families on the housing waiting list and LBE are starting to worry, masses of new build but the wrong type, the wrong size and many standing empty whilst the housing list continues to grow. They have allowed the developers to get away with minimal social housing as it eats into their profits. To call an addition of three storeys a minor amendment is an insult to Acton residents.Perhaps Ealing Planning could provide their definition of a minor amendment?There has been no extra social housing added to the scheme and remaining at 28 units of 364, takes the percentage of social housing within the scheme from 8%, to seriously below the 35% recommended in the London Plan. This development should never have been granted planning permission.The borough has waiting times of up to eight years for small family units, this development should be providing many more social tenancies.  This application should not be considered without a considerable increase in social tenancies.As well as the £2,448,126.80 Section 106 money agreed by the Developer is the provision of a Community facility to be used by local community groups.  Under the current terms it can only be used no more than twice a week, Monday to Friday excluding Public Holidays for four hours at a time.  What good is this to a community of 364 households?  Should this further application be passed, the upping of the use of the Community Facility should also be considerably increased.With the lack of social becoming an embarrassment to LBE, we may win using this objection. Ealing has three times more homeless than any other London borough. Objecting is always a numbers game. If another 40 or 50 more people showed they cared about the lack of social tenancies and objected, I think we may, for once, stand a chance getting this application rejected. https://pam.ealing.gov.uk/online-applications/simpleSearchResults.do?action=firstPage Ref: 185890VARLand is finite and this development is not a good use of this quickly disappearing resource.

Libby Kemp ● 2823d1 Comments ● 2817d

Prolific Murderer - Harold Jones?

Further to the B.B.C. 4 documentary Dark Son - The Hunt for a Serial Killer being broadcast nationally at 9.00 pm on Tuesday February 12.  South Wales Police are actively pursuing forensic opportunities to link Abertillery-born Jones to the murder of 12 year-old Swansea school-girl Muriel Joan Drinkwater, 3 months after he left the army in 1946. A third cold-case team are actively researching Jones' possible involvement in the murder of Ignac Ulycz in Putney in August 1965. See information below from my book "Who Was Jack the Stripper? The Hammersmith Nudes' Murders."(At 10.45 pm on Sunday 15 August 1965, Mr Ignac Ulycz was fatally stabbed outside his own front gate at 323 Upper Richmond Road Putney...........Maddalena Ulycz told the police the assailant was between 50 and 60 years old. (Jones was 59.) Another witness said that the attacker had run around the corner into Colinette Road and just seemed to vanish into thin air. (Jones had been living in 20 Colinette Road.)The Wandsworth Boro' News of Friday 24 September 1965 reported on the inquest into the death of Mr Ulycz.........."The man who killed Mr Ulycz........may have been insane or a psychopath who every now and again feels the desire to attack someone in this way" suggests the Coroner Mr Gavin Thurston.)The fact has now emerged that Jones was living at 20 Colinette Road Putney using the name Harry Stevens while AT THE SAME TIME registered as living at 51 Aldensley Road Hammersmith under the name Harry Jones.

Neil Milkins ● 2819d0 Comments ● 2819d

Re: Private Developer Brought in to Friary Park Project

The www.actonw3.com  story of 18 January 2019 about Catalyst Housing Goup's new partnership with Mount Anvil, developer of luxury apartments for foriegn investors, contains many crucial errors in its attempt to publiise a CHG blog of 9 January 2019. First, as CHG has never had any sort of discussion with their tenants whom they portray as all being illiterate, Black benefit claimants, this announcement comes as yet another surprise. The repeated claims by the Acton3 editor that there has been consultation are completely false. When the Homes and Communities Agency finally stopped CHG from selling off social housing to its own managers in 2017 the Acton3 editor refused to report that to people in Acton.Since 2012 CHG has been a Community Benefit Society and the Asset-Owning parent of a group that includes 9 unregistered subsidiaries all claiming the same tax exempt status of Catalyst Housing Trust and using Ealing Gateway, 26-30 Uxbridge Road, London W5 2AU as their business address. CHG is in the business of selling houses in London and the South East through their unique Equity Loans. CHG and its subsidiaries employ 729 people with a turnover for the year to 31 March 2016 of £227 million. The CHG annual accounts show a £53 million profit but uses the term “surplus” to maximise tax avoidance on huge income from its equity loans, sales and private renting. The CHG website www.chg.org.uk actually boasts that social rent is a rapidly declining proportion of its income.Second the original 2014 plan was to demolish all the family homes on the Friary Park estate to build a 29 storey tower block. It was opposed by local home owners shocked that CHG wanted to allow illiterate, Black benefit claimants to look into their gardens. Tory leader Marie Lowe set up the Friars Green Residents Association which now only functions to support Sadiq Khan's Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corportation and make money from Ealing Council for Ms Lowe. CHG went to great lengths and expense to assure local property owners like Ealing Council Labour leader Julian Bell that the new flats would be put on sale for £450,000 and the project would not adversely affect local property values. This plan however was illegal because of the 2014 Supreme Court ruling R. (Moseley) v Haringey LBC [2014] 1 W.L.R. 3947 that requires CHG to get the majority of tenants to agree to be moved after meaning consultation. Third the latest proposal, like the orgnal demolition plan, was announced by CHG without consulting the residents of the Friay Park estate or even the planning department of London Borouh of Ealing, claims it will reprovision 225 homes for social rent alongside new shared ownership homes, even delivering 50% affordable housing by what are described as 'habitable rooms', resulting in 930 mixed-tenure homes. This 4 fold increase in dwellings is to be achived by building what are known as "Dog boxes" designed by Anne Markey of Phelan Architects and member of the CHG board. It would mean that some on the same estate would pay the £124 per week social rent while others would pay £375 per week for a shared ownership flat in which the buyer only gets a 25% equity. On the other hand 'an improved community facility' would be simple to achieve as all CHG tenants are excluded from the community centre which is currently used as offices for CHG staff.Finally Ian McDermott is the latest in a long line of dishonest and grossly incompetent CHG managers. He might be unaware that in 2017 the Environmental Law Foundation obtained the Planning Contravention Notice which forced CHG to close the illegal garage it operated on the estate with a dozen lorries causng noise and pollution every day of the week. Maybe he is so new he is unaware that CHG stopped repairs on the estate and have taken elderly and disabled tenants to court for sums less than they were due in Housing Benefit in a despicable attempt to gain possession. This discrimination is supported by Labour leader Julian Bell and Dr Rupa Huq the local MP who want elderly and disabled people moved, claiming they cost Ealing Council too much. The Labour Party supports CHG because they can claim they have provided a “new home” each time a disabled and elderly person is forced out of London and a shared ownership client moves in. It is also beyond qesion that CHG need help with design and construction experience as they have conspicuously failed to provide good quality, affordable homes as is clearly demonstated by their 132 rat infested shared ownership properies in South Acton purchased through a £70 mllion loan arranged by Labour run Ealing Council. It is unclear if Mr MDermott was in charge in June 2018 when CHG made false claims that Laing’s had insulated all the blocks on the Friary Park estate with asbestos when it was built in 1988. CHG, which has traded under several names over the last 30 years, had promised the estate would be properly insulated because it never was originally. A few weeks later CHG targeted elderly and disabled tenants telling them they were being moved and if they failed to take the offer they would be forcibly evicted. Then in November 2018 CHG painted arrows and numbers on the roads and pavements on the estate, pinpointing drains and underground infrastructure and telling tenants the water and electricity was be cut off during repairs to damage caused by the CH lorries but clearly this was just another stage in CHG's Project Fear. It is yet to be ascertained if Killian Hurley of Mount Anvil is also a member of Sinn Fein, an important issue becuase as far from delivering better homes for Friary Park residents, CHG has directly employed Irish Nationalist thugs who tried to force elderly and disabled residents from their homes.For 30 years the Friary Park estate has been a thriving neighbourhood, a coherent community that CHG now wants to rip apart and cause serious financial problems for the families. The curent plan will allow the Labour Party to lie about providng new homes, which is why they arranged a £30 million loan that no bank would give CHG. The truth is the latest proposals would drastically increase demand on transport, health and education services in Acton by increasing the current population on the site from 340  to around 2,000 and only benefit the CHG board members and their business partners at the taxpayers’ expense.

Martin Cain ● 2838d8 Comments ● 2825d