Forum Topics

Council £85m Cuts Proposals

I was at the Cabinet meeting on Tuesday where the Labour council outlined the need for budget savings totaling £85m over 4 years and placed the blame squarely on the Coalition Government.  It is interesting that this figure has changed at least three times in as many weeks. The figure is also not strictly true.  Whilst some of our fiscal problems will inevitably end up in local authority finances - the figures being quoted are misleading and open to challenge. Conservative opposition calculations show that of the £85m now being suggested as a saving target around 2/3rd of all the "cuts" can't be explained by changes in Government Formula Grant. For example spending £3.5m bringing council house management back into the council - money that could have kept libraries open and park ranger services intact - is a council decision.Our analysis also show that the councils' "30% budget cuts" story is based on figures that would require an accountant 20 minutes to explain. The schools budget is the same this year as last year. The councils net spending on services is up year on year!These are challenging times for everybody, but it would help if we could have a real debate about the real extent of the councils financial position rather than the current narrative which is designed to provide cover for changes to services.I apologise for the long post. I hope Acton residents will join in the debate. It is an important debate when services are at risk.Cllr Mark ReenShadow Cabinet Member for FinanceLondon Borough of Ealing

Mark Reen ● 5579d4 Comments ● 5575d