Forum Topics

response from Ealing Council re Churchfield Road

First of two responses.Dear Apologise for the delay in responding. AS for Churchfield Road, while there is a net loss of three bays, the existing combined permit parking/pay and display bays are being replaced with exclusive pay and display bays.  This should free up parking previously used by permit holders for patrons of the adjacent shops.  This was in response to feedback from business owners who wanted the parking to be short stay only, as vehicles with permits, including large vans, are frequently left in these spaces for extended periods of time, preventing customers from parking there. This has been discussed in meetings and generally agreed that this change would help to support local businesses, one of the main objectives of the high street improvement scheme. The public consultation was carried out early this year. The majority of the public were in the favour of the scheme to improve the public realm (91% in favour) and in particular the parking changes (81% were in favour.) with 75% in favour of having the parking bays flush with the footway The changes to the adjacent CPZ are not part of this scheme but were undertaken as a separate review.  This review will result in the K2 CPZ zone being amalgamated with K zone, effectively increasing the enforceable hours from one hour in the morning and one hour in the evening to all day.  This was supported by the majority of the respondents in the K2 area. No pay and display or stop and shop bays are being changed as a result of this scheme. There have been a few on-site issues relating to the placement of the new street trees due to the underground services.  These sorts of issues are not uncommon on highway schemes as sometimes the location of underground services deviate from plans provided by the statutory authority.  We are working with the architect who designed the scheme to properly site the trees. Please note that we will be enhancing the area with additional trees. The scheme is mainly funded by Government Office for London grant and the grant is only available this financial year thus the reason to complete by March. We appreciate that works can be disruptive and apologise for any inconvenience cause while they are on-going.  We are confident however that the short term disruption will be far outweighed by the long-term benefits of the scheme that should make the area an even more inviting place to shop. Regards

Maire Lowe ● 3205d5 Comments ● 3204d

Street Lighting

My husband and I are unhappy to hear that Ealing Council have decided to dim the street lights after 10 pm as they think it will save money. This is surely a false economy. We were given the impression that the LED lighing would save money which was why they were introduced in the first place!Her are a few points to consuder before making any decision.Winter evenings especially are much darker since the LED lights were introduced.The LED lighting does not provide sufficient light to make one feel safe as they will be too dim to see properly when they are reduced after 10 pm.Streets are only swept once in every 6 weeks and we end up with piles of leaves which are slippery after rain. This could cause accidents!In winter when there is frost on the ground, walking in darkened streets will create a hazard.Walking through discarded rubbish is also a factor to consider. Bicycles attached to street furniture could cause people to trip.Crossing roads after 10 pm will be even more hazardous for residents, motorists may not be aware of people especially if they ars wearing dark clothing until it is too late.Dimmed lighting will be considered a godsend to ciminals, nice dark areas to conceal their activities. We have had recent reports of burglars in this area so hearing the strert lighting will be reduced even further is a great worry to residents.Please don't be penny wise and pound foolish, the lives of residents must be foremost in your minds. Do reconsider before making rash decisions. 

Jean F Fernandez ● 3212d2 Comments ● 3211d