Forum Topics

Crossrail works Overnight this weekend - update

Acton Yard Crossrail Works: Information Bulletin Saturday 16 November – Friday 13 December 2013 We need to do some additional work this weekend which was not included in the previous bulletin. The information in this bulletin therefore supersedes the information on work from 16 November onwards in the last bulletin sent to residents. All works highlighted in red are the particularly noisy works which residents may notice. Saturday 16 November to Friday 22 November Sunday (00.01 – 16.00) Piling for overhead line equipment just to the east of Noel Road Bridge. This involves driving tubular steel piles into the ground and is likely to generate some hammering noise and possible vibration. Saturday (22.00) to Sunday (16.00) Excavation of ballast on the yard side to the east of Noel Road Bridge. Followed by laying of new rail track Sunday (16.00-20:00) Tamping ballasted areas which may create some noise. Monday to Saturday (08.00 – 18.00) Works include: Laying new track by diveunder Constructing the base of the diveunder Works to install the pump chamber near Noel Road Delivery of rails and sleepers to Acton Yard Continuing building track sections in Acton Yard Continued excavation of the dive-under and ancillary works to the structure General works on site and along the track 24 hours a day Small boring machine will be tunnelling from opposite Oakley House under the tracks to create a new drainage system. Sunday (00.01 -05.00) Overhead line cable works will take place along the track. Residents may notice machinery on the track.

Maria Fitzsimmons ● 4687d0 Comments ● 4687d

The Oaks - let's stop the political point scoring

I was as unhappy about the Oaks planning decision as anyone – I attended the demonstration the Saturday before and my wife went to the planning committee meeting – but I am disgusted by the way that some people have tried to turn this into a party political issue, and the lies they have hurled against individual councillors.Can I just remind everyone of a few facts:The council does not own the land (the car park has already been sold for a hefty price) and planning law does not give the council the power to keep on blocking the development without good reason. This is the third planning proposal for the Oaks site. Compared to the previous proposals, the council has successfully reduced the height of the development but to keep on blocking the plans could have left the council exposed to legal action. I think the council should have pushed back harder earlier, but we must understand the weak position it was in.It is completely false to claim that the planning proposal was “whipped through” or that council leader Julian Bell “lobbied” for the plans.  I have talked to several of the councillors involved and they insist the decision was made strictly according to the planning rules. They felt bound to accept a plan they thought was the best that could be achieved in the circumstances and, at least, was better than nothing. The Oaks, as well as the Town Hall and Baths redevelopment, are vital to transforming Acton into the area we all want it to be.Labour was not united - the three Labour councillors for Acton Central, the most affected ward, all have big reservations about the project and two of them attended the demonstration and spoke out at the planning meeting. Labour has not made this a political issue, but the other parties are trying to do so, distributing misleading leaflets and making false allegations on fora like this one. If anything, the Tories and the Liberals would appear to be the ones who were “whipped”, by voting en mass to reject the plan. They are desperate to land some blows anyway they can on what they know is a very successful council.I believe those of us who are unhappy about the plans should join the lobby of the London Mayor and if that fails, should redouble our efforts to ensure the second phase of the project is better than the first. If we all stand together on this, rather than peddle lies and try to score cheap political points, we will be much more effective.

Robert John Anderson ● 4707d38 Comments ● 4690d